國內教育學門學術期刊評比研究
An Evaluation of Education Journals in Taiwan
- 關鍵字：
- 期刊評比、期刊分級 / Journal evaluation、Ranking of journals、TSSCI
第五十輯．第三期 - 2004-09-30
教育哲學的新展望--評N. Blake P. Smeyers R. Smith & P. Standish， ?The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education? 洪仁進
The Perspective of Philosophy of Education
教育意義的新探索--評D. Carr， ?Making Sense of Education?李奉儒
Li Feng-Jihu
國內教育學門學術期刊評比研究黃毅志、吳武典、馬信行、郭實渝、曾進興、黃秀霜、劉淑蓉
An Evaluation of Education Journals in TaiwanYih-Jyh Hwang Wu-Tien Wu Hsen-Hsing Ma Shih-Yu Kuo Chin-Hsing Tseng Hsiu-Shaung Huang Shwu-Yong Liu
邁向課程實踐理論化的行動研究 林佩璇
Theorizing Curriculum Practice in Action ResearchPei-Hsuan Lin
性取向污名之建構、抗拒與轉化：一個同性戀議題的教學實踐林昱貞、楊佳羚、張明敏
Resistance and Transformation of Students' Perceptions toward Stigmatized HomosexualityYu-Chen Lin Chia-Ling Yang Ming-Min Chang
論全球化的道德處境與論辯倫理學的先驗回歸王俊斌
The Moral Conditions of Globalization and the Retranscendentalization of Discourse EthicsChun-Ping Wang
G. Vico「詩性智慧」的哲學構造與教育蘊義吳靖國
The Philosophical Structure of G. Vico'sChin-Kuo Wu
後現代學校行政倫理及其兩難困境之解決黃乃熒
Postmodern Ethics in School Administration and the Resolution for Its DilemmaNai-Ying Whang
- 摘要
- 英文摘要
- 參考文獻
- 全文下載
1997年國科會委託的「教育相關期刊排序」計畫，以及隨後由教育學期刊選出的TSSCI名單，已經給臺灣教育學界帶來極大的衝擊，許多期刊因而改變了編輯、審查與出版制度。這項期刊排序計畫推動至今，已有多年，有必要進行第二次的期刊學術水準之排序（評比）。本研究以上次排序的教育期刊為基礎，加上新創的期刊，從中選取平均每期刊登教育學術論文達到兩篇以上者納入評比；並透過問卷調查的方式，建立教育學者對各期刊的評價指標；對納入排序的期刊所列參考書目做內容分析，計算期刊間相互引用次數，建立引用指標；進而根據這些指標，計算各期刊評比總分，並採用群落分析，依此總分將期刊分成四個等級。而本研究所做的信效度分析，也顯示各項評比指標具有良好的測量品質。
Several years have passed since the first ranking of educational journals sponsored by National Science Council was conducted and the result announced. Four years later， a second-round evaluation of education journals was launched again. Journals evalu?ated in 1997 as well as new comers that published at least two articles on research in education were included in the second-round evaluation. Ranking information col?lected from educational researchers as well as counts of mutual citations in the refer?ence list of the paper are analyzed for producing new list of ranking. Each journal re?ceived an evaluation score by summing up scores obtained from all indicators. Cluster analysis was used to assign these journals to four ranks.
