G. Vico「詩性智慧」的哲學構造與教育蘊義
The Philosophical Structure of G. Vico's
- 關鍵字：
- 詩性智慧、教育哲學 / Poetic wisdom、Vico、Educational philosophy
第五十輯．第三期 - 2004-09-30
教育哲學的新展望--評N. Blake P. Smeyers R. Smith & P. Standish， ?The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education? 洪仁進
The Perspective of Philosophy of Education
教育意義的新探索--評D. Carr， ?Making Sense of Education?李奉儒
Li Feng-Jihu
國內教育學門學術期刊評比研究黃毅志、吳武典、馬信行、郭實渝、曾進興、黃秀霜、劉淑蓉
An Evaluation of Education Journals in TaiwanYih-Jyh Hwang Wu-Tien Wu Hsen-Hsing Ma Shih-Yu Kuo Chin-Hsing Tseng Hsiu-Shaung Huang Shwu-Yong Liu
邁向課程實踐理論化的行動研究 林佩璇
Theorizing Curriculum Practice in Action ResearchPei-Hsuan Lin
性取向污名之建構、抗拒與轉化：一個同性戀議題的教學實踐林昱貞、楊佳羚、張明敏
Resistance and Transformation of Students' Perceptions toward Stigmatized HomosexualityYu-Chen Lin Chia-Ling Yang Ming-Min Chang
論全球化的道德處境與論辯倫理學的先驗回歸王俊斌
The Moral Conditions of Globalization and the Retranscendentalization of Discourse EthicsChun-Ping Wang
G. Vico「詩性智慧」的哲學構造與教育蘊義吳靖國
The Philosophical Structure of G. Vico'sChin-Kuo Wu
後現代學校行政倫理及其兩難困境之解決黃乃熒
Postmodern Ethics in School Administration and the Resolution for Its DilemmaNai-Ying Whang
- 摘要
- 英文摘要
- 參考文獻
- 全文下載
在《新科學》（New Science）中G. Vico賦予「詩性智慧」作為人類創造民政社會的根本動力，而要理解「詩性智慧」，必然地要放在「人的本性」和「天神意旨」之間的脈絡中來探討，故我們嘗試將「詩性」和「智慧」拆開來討論，讓「詩性」回歸人的自然本性，讓「智慧」扣緊天神意旨的脈絡，而發現這樣的構造不僅僅十分類似於「哲學」的構造（也就是「愛」與「智」兩者的結合），並且蘊含著「教育」的意義。本文之目的即欲藉由對Vico「詩性智慧」的說明，以重返「愛智」之路，並進而探討另一種「教育哲學」的可能性。
In New Science， Vico considered “poetic wisdom” as the essential power for creat?ing civil society. The “poetic wisdom” should be understood in the context of human nature and the divine providence. The notion of poetic wisdom can be divided into “poetic character” and “wisdom”. “Poetic character” initiates from natural hu?man instincts while “wisdom” is related to divine providence. The combination of “poetic character” and “wisdom” is similar to that of “love” and “wisdom” in philosophi?cal structure. This article asserts that Vico’s idea of “poetic wisdom” can help people returning to the love for wisdom. It also indicates another possibility of educational philosophy worthwhile for further investigation.
