第四十八輯.第三期 - 2002-09-30

從「現象學反思」到「意識型態批判」--論Husserl與Apel的方法論對比及其在教育研究上的意義

From Phenomenological Reflections to Ideological Critics--Methodological Comparison between Husserl and Apel and Its Implications on Educational Research

作 者:
王俊斌 / Chung-Ping Wang
關鍵字:
現象學反思、意識型態批判、教育學方法論 / Phenomenological reflection、Ideological critics、Educational methodology
  • 摘要
  • 英文摘要
  • 參考文獻
  • 全文下載
本文係以方法論的反省為著眼,就Edmund Husserl的「現象學反思」(phenomenological reflection)與Kral-Otto Apel所主張的「意識型態批判」(ideological critics)做為對比的焦點。基於方法對立性的凸顯,本文企圖一方面試著聚焦於「現象學反思」與「意識型態批判」在知識論與方法學上比較;另一方面則為期待透過這樣的對照,進而探索其在教育研究方法論反思上所孕含的意義。
Based on methodological reflection foundation, the researcher compares the methodological standpoints between Edmund Husserl’s “phenomenological reflection” and Kral-Otto Apel’s “ideological critics” in this paper. The main purposes of this article are as follows: to explore the significance of methodological comparison and inquire its educational research implications.