第六十三輯．第四期（Learning to Labor四十年紀念專刊） - 2017-12-31

學習做勞工,同時做男人: 反學校文化中階級與性別的交織之民族誌研究

Learning to Labor While Learning to be a Man: An Ethnographic Study of the Intersectionality of Class and Gender in the Counter-School Culture

作　者：
楊巧玲 / Chiao-Ling Yang
關鍵字：
反學校文化、交織性、批判民族誌、性別、階級 / counter-school culture, intersectionality, critical ethnography, gender, class
  • 摘要
  • 英文摘要
  • 參考文獻
  • 全文下載
P. Willis的Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs 出版至今已40年,促使後來的研究者視學校為一政治、社會、文化鬥爭的場域, 並能了解青少年的身分認同如何在學校中形構而成,影響深遠,經典地位無庸置 疑。本文著眼於其主要發現與論證,即反學校文化中階級與性別如何交織共構而 成勞工子弟的身分認同,首先從四位一體的角度,分別針對其基本議題、技法、 認識論、存在論進行評析,以期形成較為全面的理解;其次將焦點置於教育的範 疇,探討這樣的經典著作對教育研究以及實務有何啟示,前者包括基本議題的深 化與開創、民族誌研究法的貢獻與侷限,後者包括教育政策與學校改革、教師角 色與師資培育;最後提出二點反思:教育研究應多著眼於教育政策的可能弔詭、 教育機會均等既是基本議題也是終極關懷。
It has been forty years since P. Willis published his seminal work, Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Two contributions stand out. One is to convincingly make it explicit that schooling serves as a site for political, social and cultural struggle. The other is to vividly analyze how youth identity is constituting and constructed in schools. This paper focuses on its major finding and argument, which is that class and gender intersect in a complicated way to form the identity of white working-class boys via the counter-school culture. To establish a more comprehensive understanding, this paper considers this influential study first in terms of four interrelated aspects, the basic issue, the technique, epistemology and ontology, and then its implications for educational research and practice. For educational research, two points are addressed: deepening and creating basic issues and the contribution and limitation of ethnographic studies; for educational practice, educational policy and school reform are discussed as well as teachers’ role and teacher education. This paper concludes with two reflections: educational research should inquire more into potential paradoxes in educational policy; equality of educational opportunity should be fundamental issues and ultimate concern.

王雅玄、陳靜盈(2012)。多元升學制度下的菁英生產:貴族習尚之學校實踐。臺灣教 育社會學研究,12(2),85-122。

[Wang, Y.-H., & Chen, C.-Y. (2012). The elite production of the multiple enrollment program: Nobility practice in an elite private school. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 12(2), 85-122.]

朱敬一(2014)。台彎所得分配惡化,隱藏不了。取自http://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/ profile/261/article/1554

[Zhu, J.-Y. (2014). tai wan suo de fen pei e hua, yin cang bu le. Retrieved from http://opinion. cw.com.tw/blog/profile/261/article/1554] 

李玉蘭(2011)。夜光天使點燈計畫專案政策分析:以傅科考古學、系譜學批判觀點。 學校行政,73,184-199。

[Li, Y.-L. (2011). A policy analysis of the project of angel lightening up in the dark: A critical perspective of Foucaudian archaeology and genealogy. School Administration, 73, 184- 199.]

李然堯(2006)。我國後期中等教育分流機制與生涯輔導之檢討。中等教育,57(6), 4-22。

[Li, R.-Y. (2006). A review of Taiwan’s secondary school career guidance and tracking mechanisms. Secondary Education, 57(6), 4-22.]

何明修(2002)。介紹:保羅‧威利斯《學作工》。教育社會通訊,41,3-7。

[He, M.-X. (2002). Introduction: Paul Willis’s “Learning to Labor”. Newsletter of Sociology of Education, 41, 3-7.] 

林安妮(2015,7月5日)。貧富差距大,5%富人佔總所得25%。聯合新聞網。取自http://udn.com/news/story/7238/1035803。

[Lin, A.-N. (2015, July 5). pin fu cha ju da, 5% fu ren zhan zong suo de 25%. Lian He Xin Wen Wang. Retrieved from http://udn.com/news/story/7238/1035803] 

林昱瑄(2007)。來自邊緣的雜音:兩位青少女哪吒的性別認同形構。臺灣教育社會學研究,7(2),83-122。

[Lin, Y.-H. (2007). Voices from marginality: The construction of gender identity on two “bad” girls. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 7(2), 83-122.]

林郡雯、張建成(2008)。不同階級國中生之文憑意象的探究。當代教育研究季刊,16(4),199-235。

[Lin, C.-W., & Chang, J.-C. (2008). Credential images of students from different social classes.Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 16(4), 199-235.] 

吳天元、洪兆南(2004)。九年一貫課程下的國中技藝教育學程之規劃與實施模式。中等教育,55(3),60-70。

[Wu., T.-Y., & Hong, Z.-N. (2004). A study of the practical arts education programs planning and implementation model in junior high schools under the grade 1-9 curriculum guidelines. Secondary Education, 55(3), 60-70.] 

吳明振、游玉英(2014)。國民中學技藝教育學程現況分析與探討。中等教育,65(2),86-109。

[Wu, M.-Z., & You, Y.-Y. (2014). Analysis and exploration of vocational education program in junior high schools. Secondary Education, 65(2), 86-109.] 

吳武典、簡茂發、洪冬桂、舒琮慧、鄒小蘭、張芝萱、吳道愉(2010)。高中學生生涯發展組型建構及其在升學與生涯輔導上的意義。教育科學研究期刊,55(2),29-72。

[Wu, W.-T., Chien, M.-F., Hung, T.-K., Shu, T.-H., Chau, H.-L., Chang, C.-H., & Wu, T.-Y.(2010). The construction of career development patterns and its applications to academic and career counseling. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(2), 29-72.] 

金樹人、許宏彬(2003)。生涯諮商介入策略對國中學生認知複雜度與生涯自我效能的影響。教育心理學報,35(2),99-120。

[Jin, S.-R., & Sheu, H.-B. (2003). The effects of career intervention strategies for improving cognitive complexity and career self-efficacy of junior-high students. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 35(2), 99-120.] 

教育部(無日期)。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫:理念與目標。2016年10月13日,取自http://12basic.edu.tw/Detail.php?LevelNo=43

[Ministry of Education. (n.d.). shi er nian guo min ji ben jiao yu shi shi ji hua: li nian yu mu biao. Retrieved October 13, 2016, from http://12basic.edu.tw/Detail.php?LevelNo=43] 

陳順利(2001)。原、漢青少年飲酒行為與學業成就之追蹤調查以臺東縣關山地區為例。教育與心理研究,24,67-98。

[Chen, S.-L. (2001). A follow up survey study on factors causing differences between aborigine’s and Han’s secondary school students’ drinking behavior and academic achievement: An example from the Qau-san area of Taitung County. Journal of Education and Psychology, 24, 67-98.]

郭振昌(2003)。青少年失業問題與就業展望。社區發展季刊,103,112-124。

[Guo, Z.-C. (2003). Unemployment problem and employment outlook for the youth. Community Development Quarterly, 103, 112-124.] 

許殷宏(2006a)。能力分班中的階級問題。課程與教學季刊,9(4),101-118。

[Hsu, Y.-H. (2006a). Class problems in ability grouping. Curriculum and Instruction Quarterly,9(4), 101-118.] 

許殷宏(2006b)。教學實踐與學生身分認同:國中美術班與普通班的比較。教育研究集刊,52(2),125-153。

[Hsu, Y.-H. (2006b). Pedagogical practice and student identity: The comparison of an art class and a regular class in a junior high school. Bulletin of Educational Research, 52(2), 125- 153.] 

張盈堃(1999)。「青少年偏差行為」的問題陳顯:從批判教育學的角度探討。社區發展季刊,88,240-253。

[Chang, Y.-K. (1999). Posing the problem of “youth delinquent behaviors”: A discussion of critical pedagogy. Community Development Quarterly, 88, 240-253.]

張翔一、吳挺鋒、熊毅晰(2014)。台灣貧富差距創新高!1%比99%的戰爭。取自http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5058705

[Zhang, X.-Y., Wu, T.-F., & Xiong, Y.-X. (2014). tai wan pin fu cha ju chuang xin gao! 1%bi99%de zhan zheng. Retrieved from http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article. action?id=5058705] 

黃鴻文(2011)。抗拒乎?拒絕乎?偏差乎?學生文化研究中抗拒概念之誤用與澄清。教育研究集刊,57(3),123-154。

[Huang, H.-W. (2011). Is resistance different from rejection and deviance? Clarifying the meaning of resistance in student culture research. Bulletin of Educational Research, 57(3),123-154.]

黃銘福、黃毅志(2014)。台灣地區出身背景、國中學業成績與高中階段教育分流之關聯。教育實踐與研究,27(2),67-98。

[Huang, M.-F., & Hwang, Y.-J. (2014). Correlation among students’ family background,  academic performance in junior high school, and senior high school tracking in Taiwan.Journal of Educational Practice and Research, 27(2), 67-98.] 

曾凡慈、林文蘭(2007)。學校民族誌的擘手:威利思之《學做工》(Learning to Labor)導讀。中等教育,58(4),146-159。

[Ceng, F.-C., & Lin, W.-L. (2007). A pioneer of school ethnography: Introducing Willis’s Learning to Labor. Secondary Education, 58(4), 146-159.] 

楊巧玲(2007)。從性別關係取徑看同儕互動:以一所高中學生的校園經驗為例。當代教育研究季刊,15(2),79-112。

[Yang, C.-L. (2007). Examining peer interaction via a gender relation approach: Taking high school students as an example. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 15(2), 79-112.] 

楊幸真(2012)。高中男生陽剛特質學習與實踐之民族誌研究。載於臺灣女性學學會、張盈堃、吳嘉麗(主編),陽剛氣質:國外論述與臺灣經驗(頁67-108)。臺北 市:巨流。 

[Yang, X.-Z. (2012). Gao zhong nan sheng yang gang te zhi xue xi yu shi jian zhi min zu zhi yan jiu. In Taiwanese Feminist Scholars Association, Y.-K. Chang, & J.-L. Wu (Eds.), yang gang qi zhi: guo wai lun shu yu tai wan jing yan (pp. 67-108). Taipei, Taiwan: Chuliu.]

楊肅棟(2001)。學校、教師、家長與學生特質對原漢學業成就的影響;以臺東縣國小 為例。臺灣教育社會學研究,1,209-247。

[Yang, S.-D. (2001). The effects of schools, teachers, parents, and students’ characteristics on students’ achievement: The case of Taitung County. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 1, 209-247.]

謝國雄(2007)。以身為度、如是我做:田野工作的教與學。載於謝國雄(主編),以 身為度、如是我做:田野工作的教與學(頁3-35)。臺北市:群學。

[Xie, G.-X. (2010). Yi shen wei du, ru shi wo zuo: tian ye gong zuo de jiao yu xue. In G.-X. Xie (Ed.), Yi Shen Wei Du, Ru Shi Wo Zuo: Tian Ye Gong Zuo De Jiao Yu Xue (pp. 3-35). Taipei, Taiwan: Socio.]

Abbey, S. (2001). Feminist academic mothers’ influences on their sons’ masculinity. In A. O’Reilly (Ed.), Mothers & sons: Feminism, masculinity, and the struggle to raise our sons (pp. 141-156). New York, NY: Routledge.

Adkins, A., & Gunzenhauser, M. G. (1999). Knowledge construction in critical ethnographies. Educational Foundations, 13(1), 61-76.

Anderson, G. L. (1989). Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status, and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 59(3), 249-270.

Anyon, J. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policies, urban education, and a new social movement. New York, NY: Routledge.

Apple, M. W., Au, W., & Gandin, L. A. (2009). Mapping critical education. In M. W. Apple, W. Au, & L. A. Gandin (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education (pp. 3-19). New York, NY: Routledge.

Arnot, M. (2004). Male working-class identities and social justice: A reconsideration of Paul Willis’s learning to labor in light of contemporary research. In N. Dolby & G. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Learning to labor in new times (pp. 17-40). New York, NY: RutledgeFalmer.

Au, W., & Apple, M. W. (2009). Rethinking reproduction: Neo-Marxism in critical education theory. In M. W. Apple, W. Au, & L. A. Gandin (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education (pp. 83-95). New York, NY: Routledge.

Bell, D., & Blanchflower, D. (2010). Youth unemployment: Déjà Vu? IZA Discussion Paper No. 4705. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1545132

Carspecken, P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research. New York, NY: Routledge. Cohen, P. (1997). Rethinking the youth question: Education, labour and cultural studies. London, UK: Macmillan.

Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Connell, R. W. (1996). Teaching the boys: New research on masculinity, and gender strategies for schools. Teachers College Record, 98(2), 206-238.

Demerath, P., Lynch, J., Milner IV, H. R., Peters, A., & Davidson, M. (2010). Decoding success:A middle-class logic of individual advancement in a U.S. suburb and high school. Teacher College Record, 112(12), 2935-2987.

Dolby, N., & Dimitriadis, G. (2004). Learning to labor in new time: An introduction. In N.Dolby & G. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Learning to labor in new times (pp. 1-14). New York, NY:RutledgeFalmer.

Erickson, F. (1984). What makes school ethnography “ethnographic”? Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 15, 51-66.

Giroux, H. (1985). Teachers as transformative intellectuals. Social Education, 49(5), 376-379. Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York, NY: Routledge.

Have, P. (2004). Understanding qualitative research and ethnomethodology. London, UK: Sage. 

Ignatiev, N. (1997). The point is not to interpret whiteness but to abolish it. Talk given at the Conference on “The making and unmaking of Whiteness.” Retrieved from http://racetraitor.org/abolishthepoint.pdf

Jacob, E. (1987). Qualitative research traditions: A review. Review of Educational Research, 57(1), 1-50.

Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist psychology and pedagogy in the postmodern. London,UK: Routledge.

LeCompte, M. D. (2002). The transformation of ethnographic practices: Past and current challenges. Qualitative Research, 2(3), 283-299.

Lewis, J. (2003). Design issues. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 47-76). London, UK: Sage. 

Kenway, J., & Fitzclarence, L. (1997). Masculinity, violence and schooling: Challenging“poisonous pedagogies”. Gender & Education, 9(1), 117. 

Kenway, J., & Kraack, A. (2004). Reordering work and destabilizing masculinity. In N. Dolby & G. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Learning to labor in new times (pp. 95-109). New York, NY: RutledgeFalmer.

McRobbie, A. (1991). Feminism and youth culture: From “Jackie” to “Just Seventeen”. London, UK: Macmillan.

Merriam, S. (2002). Assessing and evaluating qualitative research. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and Analysis (pp. 18-33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Mills, D., & Gibb, R. (2004). “Centre” and periphery: An interview with Paul Willis. In N. Dolby & G. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Learning to labor in new times (pp. 197-226). New York, NY: RutledgeFalmer.

Nayak, A., & Kehily, M. J. (1996). Playing it straight: Masculinities, homophobias and schooling. Journal of Gender Studies, 5(2), 211.

Noblit, G. W. (2004). Reinscribing critique in educational ethnography: Critical and postcritical ethnography. In K. deMarrais & S. D. Lapan (Eds.), Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences (pp. 181-215). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Nolan, K., & Anyon, J. (2004). Learning to do time: Willis’s model of cultural reproduction an era of postindustrialism, globalization, and mass incarceration. In N. Dolby & G. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Learning to labor in new times (pp. 133-149). New York, NY: RutledgeFalmer.

Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Ogbu, J. (1974). The next generation: An ethnography of education in an urban neighborhood. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Price, J. (1999). Schooling and racialized masculinities: The diploma, teachers, and peers in the lives of young, African American men. Youth & Society, 31(2), 224.

Redman, P. (1996). Curtis loves Ranjit: Heterosexual masculinities, schooling and pupils’ sexual cultures. Educational Review, 48(2), 175-183.

Roediger, D. (1994). Towards the abolition of whiteness. New York, NY: Verso.
Scarpetta, S., Sonnet, A., & Manfredi, T. (2010). Rising youth unemployment during the crisis: How to prevent negative long-term consequences on a generation? Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kmh79zb2mmv-en

Sennett, R., & Cobb, J. (1972). The hidden injuries of class. New York, NY: Norton & Company. 

Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Valencia, R. (Ed.). (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. London, UK: Falmer.

Weis, L. (1990). Working class without work: High school students in a de-industrializing economy. New York, NY: Routledge.

Weis, L. (2004). Revisiting a 1980s “moment of critique”: Class, gender and the new economy. In N. Dolby & G. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Learning to labor in new times (pp. 111-132). New York, NY: RutledgeFalmer.

Whitty, G. (2001). Education, social class and social exclusion. Journal of Education Policy,16(4), 287-295.

Willis, P. (1997). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Aldershot,UK: Ashgate.

Willis, P. (2000). Ethnographic imagination. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
 

Willis, P. (2004). Twenty-five years on: Old books, new times. In N. Dolby & G. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Learning to labor in new times (pp. 167-196). New York, NY: RutledgeFalmer. 

Willis, P., & Trondman, M. (2002). Manifesto for ethnography. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 2(3), 394-402.

Wink, J. (2010). Critical pedagogy: Notes from the real world (4th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Pearson.

Zeichner, K. (2009). Teacher education and the struggle for social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.

Zeichner, K., & Flessner, R. (2009). Educating teachers for critical education. In M. Apple, W.Au, & L. A.Gandin (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education 

全文下載

國立臺灣師範大學教育學系教育研究集刊 Department of Education, National Taiwan Normal University

106308 臺北市大安區和平東路一段162號 / No.162, Sec. 1, Heping E. Rd., Da'an Dist., Taipei City 106, Taiwan (R.O.C.)       

+886-2-77493892　+886-2-77493878