第六十六輯．第三期 - 2020-09-30

支持教改實踐的教科書設計: 以日本中學校理科教科書中生物單元之論述分析為例

Textbook Design to Support the Enactment of Educational Reform: Discourse Analysis of a Biology Unit in a Japanese Junior High School Science Textbook

作　者：
林君憶 / Chun-Yi Lin
關鍵字：
科學探究、素養、教科書設計、語料庫輔助論述分析、課程改革實踐 / scientific inquiry, competencies, textbook design, corpus-assisted discourse analysis, curriculum reform enactment
  • 摘要
  • 英文摘要
  • 參考文獻
  • 全文下載
本研究採語料庫輔助論述分析，主要探究日本中學校(即國中)三年級理科教科書「生命的延續性」單元設計，部分參照臺灣教科書內容，探討教科書設計於教改脈絡下之意涵。研究發現，日本單元課程設計融合了目標與歷程模式， 由日常現象引介學生能探究的問題，圖文版式採大幅攝影供觀察討論、以角色插 畫及比臺灣單元使用更少的專有名詞與更多驅動學習表現的動詞，鼓勵學生投入 探究活動，以獲得概念理解，並活用理解來思考新問題。其意涵包括教科書創造 活用科學概念與探究的情境，以解決問題、適應社會作為學習的脈絡;視學生為 探究社群裡知識的建構者與問題解決者，經教師從旁協助運用科學探究方法習得 概念、知識與技術，學生再進行小型自由研究。教材提供支持課程改革實踐之完 整、穩定且普及的教學鷹架，有利於師生持續投入創造課堂探究社群的新學習經 驗。
Using corpus-assisted discourse analysis, this study primarily analyzed the design of a unit titled “Continuation of Life” in a Japanese science textbook for third-year junior high schoolers with reference to a Taiwanese unit. The study also examined textbook design implications in the context of educational reform. The unit in the Japanese textbook integrates the objective and process curriculum models. To encourage learners to inquire and apply their understanding to manage new problems, the unit introduces inquiry questions through natural phenomena, presents large photographs for observation and discussion, and uses more character illustrations, less terminology, and more verbs that drive learning performance than Taiwanese counterparts do. The findings have the following implications. Textbooks can create learning contexts in which students use science concepts and inquiry to solve problems and adapt to the society. Students are regarded as problem solvers and knowledge constructors in a community of inquiry; with teachers’ facilitation, students use scientific inquiry methods to acquire concepts, knowledge, and skills, and then conduct small projects for independent inquiry. Textbooks can serve as comprehensive, stable, and pervasive scaffolds to support the enactment of curriculum reform; they may help teachers and learners co-create new learning experiences in developing inquiry communities in classrooms.

日本教材出版(無日期)。2020年度全國教科書採擇表。2020年5月30日，取自https:// www.nihonkyouzai.jp/kyozai/list/11089

[Japan Teaching materials Publishing. (n.d.). 2020 national textbook adoption table. Retrieved May 30, 2020, from https://www.nihonkyouzai.jp/kyozai/list/11089]

文部科學省(2009)。學習指導要領「生きる力」。取自http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/ shotou/new-cs/youryou/chu/ri.htm

[Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2009). New course of study in junior high school. Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/new-cs/ youryou/chu/ri.htm]

文部科學省(2017)。新しい学習指導要領の考え方—中央教育審議会における議論か ら改訂そして実施へ。取自https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/new-cs/__icsFiles/ afieldfile/2017/09/28/1396716_1.pdf

[Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2017). The way of thinking of the new course of study – The discussion of the central council for education about revision and implementation. Retrieved from https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/ shotou/new-cs/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2017/09/28/1396716_1.pdf]

李明玲、溫媺純(2017)。教科書中科學知識架構之內容分析— 以生殖與遺傳單元為 例。科學教育學刊，25(3)，219-243。

[Lee, M.-L., & Wen, M. L. (2017). The content analysis of the science knowledge framework in textbooks: An example of reproduction and heredity units. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 219-243.]

吳貞儀、林陳涌、張永達(2016)。文本知識編排順序對國中學生遺傳學閱讀理解的影 響。課程與教學季刊，19(3)，85-112。

[Wu, J.-Y., Lin, C.-Y., & Chang, Y.-T. (2016). The effects of knowledge sequences of texts on junior high school students' reading comprehension of genetics. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 19(3), 85-122.]

佘曉清、林煥祥(主編)(2017)。PISA 2015臺灣學生的表現。臺北市:心理。
[She, H.-C., & Lin, H.-S. (Eds.). (2017). Taiwan student performance on PISA 2015. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological.]

林明煌(2008)。從日本《學習指導要領》的修訂探討其教育變革與發展。教育資料集 刊，40，49-84。

[Lin, M.-H. (2008). Educational reform and development in Japan seen from the revision of the curriculum guidelines. Bulletin of Educational Resources and Research, 40, 49-84.]

周珮儀、鄭明長(2016)。邁向多元典範的教科書研究方法論。課程與教學季刊，19 (3)，1-26。

[Chou, P.-I., & Cheng, M.-C. (2016). Textbook research methodology: Towards a pluralistic paradigm. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 19(3), 1-26.]

岡村定矩、荒井豐、飯牟禮俊紀、五百川裕、伊藤聰、大木聖子⋯⋯結城千代子 (2016)。新編新しい科学3。東京都:東京書籍株式會社。

[Okamura, S., Arae, M., Iimure, T., Iokawa, Y., Ito, A., Ooki, S., ... Yuuki, C. (2016). New edition new science 3. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Shoseki.]

秋田喜代美(2018，4月)。以素養為基礎的探究學習:關於日本新學習指導要領的改 訂。「素養導向課程深耕與創新教學」研討會，淡江大學課程與教學研究所，臺北 市。

[Akita, K. (2018, April). Competence-based inquiry learning: The revision of Japanese curriculum guidelines. Presented at the conference of Competence-Based Curriculum Development and Innovative Teaching, Taipei, Taiwan.]

教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要自然與生活科技學習領域。取自https:// cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=9&mid=265

[Ministry of Education. (2008). Curriculum guidelines of grades 1-9 science and technology. Retrieved from https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=9&mid=265]

教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ ezfiles/0/1000/attach/87/pta_18543_581357_62438.pdf

[Ministry of Education. (2014). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education. Retrieved from https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/87/pta_18543_581357_62438.pdf] 

國家教育研究院課程及教學研究中心核心素養工作圈(2015)。十二年國民基本教育核心素養發展手冊。取自https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/23/relfile/8006/51358/9df0910c-56e0-433a-8f80-05a50efeca72.pdf

[The Group of Core Competencies in Curriculum and Instruction at Research Center of National Academy for Educational Research. (2015). Core competencies development manual of 12-year basic education. Retrieved from https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/23/relfile/8006/51358/9df0910c-56e0-433a-8f80-05a50efeca72.pdf]

國家教育研究院(2019)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校自然科學領域課程手冊。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/67/130108399.pdf

[National Academy for Educational Research. (2019). Curriculum guidelines in natural science of 12-year basic education for elementary schools, junior high schools, and general senior high schools. Retrieved from https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/67/130108399. pdf ]

黃茂在、吳敏而(2019)。從幾堂好課，談素養導向自然科學教科書編寫設計。教育研 究月刊，303，81-100。

[Huang, M.-T., & Wu, R. J. (2019). The design and writing of competency based natural science textbooks. Journal of Education Research, 303, 81-100.]

佐藤學(2014)。學習革命的願景:學習共同體的設計與實踐(黃郁倫，譯)。臺北 市:天下文化。(原著出版於1999)

[Sato, M. (2014). The vision of the learning revolution: Design and practice of learning community (Y.-L. Huang, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Commonwealth. (Original work published 1999)]

陳鏗任、蔡曉楓(2012)。以科學探究精神開展通識教育:Schwab在芝加哥大學的超越 與實踐。教育研究集刊，58(2)，71-108。

[Chen, K.-Z., & Tsai, H.-F. (2012). Transforming general education through scientific enquiry: The curriculum development and implementation of Schwab at the University of Chicago. Bulletin of Educational Research, 58(2), 71-108.]

游美惠(2000)。內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用。調查研究，8， 5-42。

[You, M.-H. (2000). Content analysis, textual analysis and discourse analysis in social research. Survey Research, 8, 5-42.]

項潔、翁稷安(2011)。導論—關於數位人文的思考:理論與方法。載於項潔(主 編)，數位人文研究的新視野:基礎與想像(頁9-20)。臺北市:國立臺灣大學出 版中心。

[Hsiang, J., & Weng, C.-A. (2011). Introduction pondering on digital humanities: Foundation and method. In J. Hsiang (Ed.), News eyes for discovery: Foundations and imaginations of digital humanities (pp. 9-20). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University Press.]

林君憶 支持教改實踐的教科書設計:以日本中學校理科教科書中生物單元之論述分析為例 69

楊龍立、黃光雄(2017)。課程發展與設計:理念與實作。臺北市:師大書苑。
[Yang, L.-L., & Huang, K.-H. (2017). Curriculum development and design: Ideas and practice. Taipei, Taiwan: Lucky Bookstore.]

 塗宥騏、陳麗華(2014)。教科書審定委員對教科書設計的關注焦點探討:以國小中年級社會學習領域為例。教育研究集刊，60(1)，115-163。

[Tu, Y.-C., & Chen, L.-H. (2014). Study on textbook reviewers’ concerns on textbook design: Taking the 3rd and 4th grade elementary social studies as examples. Bulletin of Educational Research, 60(1), 115-163.]

 歐用生(2012)。日本中小學「單元教學研究」分析。教育資料集刊，54，121-147。

 [Ou, Y.-S. (2012). An analysis of the “lesson study” in Japanese elemental and junior high schools. Bulletin of Educational Resources and Research, 54, 121-147.] 

闕河嘉、陳光華(2016)。庫博中文獨立語料庫分析工具之開發與應用。載於項潔(主 編)，數位人文:在過去、現在和未來之間(頁285-313)。臺北市:國立臺灣大學出版中心。

[Chueh, H.-C., & Chen, K.-H. (2016). CORPRO: A Chinese language corpus tool and a case study of media representation of organic agriculture. In J. Hsiang (Ed.), Digital humanities: Between past, present, and future (pp. 285-313). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University Press.]

Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., ... Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419.

Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-14.

Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction: Assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. Science Teacher, 72(7), 30-33.

Belland, B. R. (2017). Instructional scaffolding in STEM education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02565-0_1

Chambliss, M. J., & Calfee, R. C. (1998). Textbooks for learning: Nurturing children’s minds. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Coenders, F., Terlouw, C., Dijkstra, S., & Pieters, J. (2010). The effects of the design and development of a chemistry curriculum reform on teachers’ professional growth: A case study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(5), 535-557.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York, NY: Routledge.

Gee, J. P. (2014). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. Hanley, J. P. (1970). Curiosity, competence, community. An evaluation of man: A course of study. Cambridge, MA: Curriculum Development Center.

Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534-2553.

Kamasa, V. (2017). Corpus linguistics for critical discourse analysis. What can we do better? In P. Pęzik & J. T. Waliński (Eds.), Language, corpora and cognition (pp. xx-xx). New York, NY: Oxford.

Klain, E. (2001). Ideologies in school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 319-329.

McTighe, J., & Seif, E. (2003). A summary of underlying theory and research base for understanding by design. Unpublished manuscript.

Michaels, S., Shouse, A. W., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2008). Ready, set, science! Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/11882

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/13165

National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results (volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Retrieved from http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/9789264266490-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/ education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf

Partington, A. (2006). Metaphors, motifs and similes across discourse types: Corpus-assisted

discourse studies (CADS) at work. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, 171, 258-294.

Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.

Taguma, M. (2017). Preliminary findings from the OECD Education 2030 project. National Institute for Educational Policy Research, 146, 95-107.

Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

 

 

 

全文下載