第六十六輯．第四期（高等教育的教與學 專刊） - 2020-12-31

應用連結論於全球導航衛星系統課程的教學設計

Using Connectivism for the Instructional Design in a GNSS Course

作　者：
陳哲銘 / Che-Ming Chen
關鍵字：
全球導航衛星系統、素養、連結論 / Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), competence, connectivism
  • 摘要
  • 英文摘要
  • 參考文獻
  • 全文下載
全球導航衛星系統是空間資訊技術的核心之一，為因應專業人才的需求，國 內各大學相關科系多在大學部開設「全球導航衛星系統」課程。過去課程的重 點偏重在瞭解基礎原理和訓練軟、硬體操作技能，但鑑於未來就業市場對於核心 素養的需要，有必要將課程的重點從訓練技能提升到培養素養。本研究應用新興 的學習理論「連結論」來進行課程的教學設計，期望透過在學習環境中強化「人 機」、「人際」與「人地」的連結來達成培養素養的目標。研究結果顯示，應用 連結論的教學可以增進學生在「專業知識」與「專業技能」方面的科學素養，但 若要培養「科學態度」，則有賴更進階的探究式課程。而地理學科所重視的「人 地」連結，可帶動更深、更廣的「人機」和「人際」連結，有助於素養學習成效 的提升。
Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) are one of the cores in geospatial technologies. In order to respond to the needs of geospatial professionals, many university departments in Taiwan have provided undergraduate GNSS courses. The introductory courses of GNSS usually focus on the understanding of basic principles and the training of hardware and software operating skills. In view of the future employment markets for key competence needs, the introductory courses need to be extend from training skills to developing competencies. In this study, we adopted a new learning theory “Connectivism” for instructional design. To achieve the goal of developing competencies, we proposed a teaching strategy by strengthening the connections among “human-device,” “human-human” and “human-environment” in the learning environment. The research results showed that the application of connectivism could improve students’ scientific competencies in “professional knowledge” and “professional skills,” but more advanced inquiry-based courses were required to develop “scientific attitude.” Moreover, the “human-environment” connection that geography emphasizes could drive deeper and broader “human-device” and “human- human” connections. It improved the effectiveness of developing competencies.

王志軍、陳麗(2014)。聯通主義學習理論及其最新進展。開放教育研究，20(5)， 11-28。

[Wang, Z., & Chen, L. (2014). The learning theory of connectivism and its latest development. Open Education Research, 20(5), 11-28.]

牛涵錚、楊勝欽(2012)。研發人員科學素養量表之建構— 以台灣電子資訊業為例。 商略學報，4(1)，59-74。

[Niu, H.-J., & Yang, S.-C. (2012). Research on developing an instrument of R&D personnel’s scientific literacy: A study on electronic information industry in Taiwan. International Journal of Commerce and Strategy, 4(1), 59-74.]

劉力仁(2019，9月18日)。高普考放榜了!錄取率9.88%錄取人數5811人。自由時報。 取自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2919111

[Liu, L.-R. (2019, September 18). The qualifiers of senior and junior civil service examinations are on the list! The admission rate was 9.88%, and the number of qualifiers was 5811. Liberty Times Net. Retrieved from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/ breakingnews/2919111]

宋曜廷、張國恩、于文正(2006)。行動載具在博物館學習的應用:促進人—機—境互 動的設計。博物館學季刊，20(1)，17-34。

[Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Yu, W.-J. (2006). Usage of mobile devices in museums: Promotion of human-computer-situation interactive design. Museology Quarterly, 20(1), 17-34.] 考選部(2020)。國家考試介紹:測量製圖類科職能分析。取自http://wwwc.moex.gov.tw/

main/content/wHandMenuFile.ashx?menu_id=1681&strType=2
[Ministry of Examination. (2020). The introduction of national examination for the recruitment of civil service staff: Job analysis of surveying and cartography. Retrieved from http://wwwc.moex.gov.tw/main/content/wHandMenuFile.ashx?menu_id=1681&strType=2] 

施添福(1990)。地理學中的空間觀點。地理研究報告，16，115-137。

[Shih, T.-F. (1990). The spatial perspective in geography. Geographical Research, 16, 115-137.]

 陳哲銘(2003)。「虛擬」野外實察— 讓野外實察更「真實」?。中等教育，54(5)，110-123。

[Chen, C.-M. (2003). Virtual field trips: Make field trips more effective? Secondary Education, 54(5), 110-123.]

教育部(2017)。高等教育深耕計畫。取自https://www.edu.tw/News_Plan_Content.aspx?n =D33B55D537402BAA&sms=954974C68391B710&s=333F49BA4480CC5B

[Ministry of Education. (2017). Higher education sprout project. Retrieved from https://www. edu.tw/News_Plan_Content.aspx?n=D33B55D537402BAA&sms=954974C68391B710&s =333F49BA4480CC5B]

楊國賜(2013)。培養新世紀大學生的關鍵能力。台灣教育，680，10-16。
[Yang, K.-S. (2013). The development of university student’s key competencies in the new century. Taiwan Education Review, 680, 10-16.]

 趙忠明、周天穎、嚴泰來(2015)。空間資訊技術原理及其應用。臺北市:儒林。 [Zhao, Z.-M., Chou, T.-Y., & Yan, T.-L. (2015). The principle and application of spatial information technologies. Taipei, Taiwan: Scholars Books.]

Akella, D. (2012). Creating a community of learners online: Connect, engage & learn. International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning, 8(1), 63-77.

Barnett, J., McPherson, V., & Sandieson, R. M. (2013). Connected teaching and learning: The uses and implications of connectivism in an online class. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(5), 685-698.

Bridgstock, R. (2016). Educating for digital futures: What the learning strategies of digital media professionals can teach higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(3), 306-315.

Brooks, A. W. (2015). Using connectivism to guide information literacy instruction with tablets. Journal of Information Literacy, 9(2), 27-36.

Cabrero, R. S., & Román, O. C. (2018). Psychopedagogical predecessors of connectivism as a new paradigm of learning. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 4(2), 29-45.

Chen, C. M., & Wang, Y. H. (2015). Geospatial education in high schools: Curriculums, methodologies, and practices. In O. Muñiz Solari, A. Demirci, & van der Schee, J. A. (Eds.), Geospatial technologies and geography education in a changing world (pp. 67-76). Tokyo, Japan: Springer.

Clarà, M., & Barberà, E. (2014). Three problems with the connectivist conception of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 197-206.

Clark, D. R. (2015). History of the ADDIE model. Retrieved from http://www.nwlink. com/~donclark/history_isd/addie.html

Downes, S. (2008). Places to go: Connectivism & connective knowledge. Innovate: Journal of  Online Education, 5(1), 1-6.

Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/me/mybooks.htm

European Commission. (2005). Lifelong learning and key competence for all: Vital contribution to prosperity and social cohesion. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-05-1405_en.htm?locale=en

Garcia, E., Elbeltagi, I., Brown, M., & Dungay, K. (2015). The implications of a connectivist learning blog model and the changing role of teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 877-894.

Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Eight views of instructional design and what they should mean to instructional designers. In B. Hokanson & A. Gibbons (Eds.), Design in educational technology (pp. 15-36). New York, NY: Springer.

Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064-1069.

Gonzalez, C. (2004). The role of blended learning in the world of technology. Retrieved from http://www.unt.edu/benchmarks/archives/2004/september04/eis.htm

Guder, C. (2010). Patrons and pedagogy: A look at the theory of connectivism. Public Services Quarterly, 6, 36-42.

Hogg, N., & Lomicky, C. S. (2012). Connectivism in postsecondary online courses: An exploratory factor analysis. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(2), 95-114.

Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past?. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3), 1-13.

Morrison, D. (2014). How to create optimal learning experiences with a learning design framework, online learning insights. Retrieved from https://onlinelearninginsights. wordpress.com/2014/01/28/how-to-create-optimal-learning-experiences-with-a-learning-

design-framework
Nair, U. (2014). Instructional design models in the 21st century: A review. EdTech Review.

Retrieved from http://edtechreview.in/trends-insights/insights/1058-instructional-design-models-in-the-21st-century-a-review

palauchen (n.d.-a). Xizhou comunity. Retrieved March 16, 2020, from https://skfb.ly/6LIBK

palauchen (n.d.-b). Tower. Retrieved March 16, 2020, from https://skfb.ly/6LIDU

palauchen (n.d.-c). Metting house. Retrieved March 16, 2020, from https://skfb.ly/6LIF8

Rodriguez, C. O. (2014). Mobimooc 2012: A new tree structure for the delivery of connectivist MOOCs. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 41-49.

Schunk, D. H. (1991). Learning theories: An educational perspective. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from http:// www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm

Siemens, G. (2012). Orientation: Sensemaking and wayfinding in complex distributed online information environments (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.

Thota, N. (2015). Connectivism and the use of technology/media in collaborative teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 142, 81-96.

UNESCO Institute for Education. (2003). Nurturing the treasure: Vision and strategy, 2002- 2007. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/uie

Utecht, J., & Keller, D. (2019). Becoming relevant again: Applying connectivism learning theory to today’s classrooms. Critical Questions in Education, 10(2), 107-119.

Verhagen, P. (2006). Connectivism: A new learning theory? Retrieved from https://zh.scribd. com/doc/88324962/Connectivism-a-New-Learning-Theory

Wang, Z., Chen, L., & Anderson, T. (2014). A framework for interaction and cognitive engagement in connectivist learning contexts. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 121-141.

Wiggins, G. P., McTighe, J., Kiernan, L. J., & Frost, F. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Yeager, C., Hurley-Dasgupta, B., & Bliss, C. A. (2013). cMOOCs and global learning: An authentic alternative. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(2), 133-147.

 

全文下載