第六十七輯．第三期 - 2021-09-30

十九世紀末至二十世紀前半葉美國進步教育流派分法與Dewey的流派歸屬

Analyzing the classification of various factions of progressive education and J. Dewey’s position in progressive education from the end of the 19th century to the first half of the 20th century

作　者：
單文經 / Wen-jing Shan
關鍵字：
Dewey的流派歸屬、美國進步教育、美國進步教育流派、理智與品格發展 / Dewey’s position, progressive education movement in the USA, factions of progressive education movement, intellectual and moral development
  • 摘要
  • 英文摘要
  • 參考文獻
  • 全文下載
本文以適切的研究文獻為據，解答19世紀末至20世紀前半葉美國進步教育流派分法與Dewey流派歸屬的有關問題。先確認Cremin雖未刻意將其分流別派卻確實為之；次蠡測學者們刻意將進步教育分流別派的緣由與作法；再經層層論述試提行政、教學、自由至上、社會重建、生活適應五分之說；隨後以遨翔在天空中的飛龍詮解Dewey不屬於任一流派之說。文末反思指出，學者們所作進步教育流派分法的討論似未慮及Dewey晚年重視的理智與品格發展，因而須予商榷；又，傳統與進步教育並非截然的二元對立，以兼而有之的觀點截長取短，或較妥當。
Based on appropriate research literatures, this article intends to answer the questions about the classification of American progressive education and the belonging of Dewey from the end of the 19th century to the first half of the 20th century. First, despite Cremin did not explicitly claim the need to divide progressive education into different factions, in actuality he did. Secondly, the reasons and practices of later scholars who intentionally classified progressive education into different factions were examined. Five factions were classified: administratives, pedagogicals, libertarians, social reconstructionists, and life adjustment educators, after a series of justifications were made. Subsequently, “the flying dragon in the sky” was employed to explain the situation that Dewey does not belong to any faction. Finally, this article argues that the classification of progressive education should be discussed because intelligence and character development, emphasized by later-stage Dewey, is not included. It also suggests that traditional and progressive education are not completely binary oppositions. It is recommended to employ “both-and” thinking to extract the strengths and discard the shortcomings of the two.

吳俊升（1972）。教育與文化論文選集。臺北市：商務。

〔Ou, T.-C. (1960). Essay collections on education and culture. Taipei: Commerce.〕

李玉馨（2010a）。「進步」的揭示與開創：論杜威學說與美國進步主義教育各派別之差異。教育科學期

　　刊，9(2)，53-76。

〔Li, Y.-S. (2010a). Revealing and creating “Progress”: Philosophical differences between John Dewey

　　and various factions within American progressive education. The Journal of Educational Science, 9,

　　53-76.〕

李玉馨（2010b）。杜威與進步主義教育。載於周愚文（主編）。進步主義與教育（頁85-115）。臺北

　　市：師大書苑。

〔Li, Y.-S. (2010b). John Dewey and progressive education. In Chou, Y.-W. (Ed.), Progressivism and

　　education(pp. 53-76). Taipei: Shi-ta.〕

李玉馨（2014）。二元調和：杜威教育哲學研究方法。載於林逢祺、洪仁進主編，教育哲學－方法篇

　　（頁543-559）。臺北市：五南。

〔Li, Y.-S. (2014). Duality reconciliation: Dewey’s research method of educational philosophy. In Lin, H.-

　　C., & Hung, J.-C. (Eds.), Philosophy of  education: Methodology (pp. 543-559). Taipei: Wu-nan.〕

周晟、謝愛磊（譯）（2009）。美國教育：一部歷史檔案（原作者：W. Urban & J. L. Wagoner）北京

　　市：中國人民大學出版社印行。（原著出版於2009）

〔Zhou, C., & Xie, A.-L. (Trans.)(2009). American education: A history (Authors: W. Urban & J. L.

　　Wagoner). Beijing: China Renmin University Press. (Originally published 2009)〕

周愚文（2010）。導言：新世紀的教育反動。載於周愚文（主編）。進步主義與教育（頁1-11）。臺北

　　市：師大書苑。

〔Chou, Y.-W. (2010b). John Dewey and progressive education. In Chou, Y.-W. (Ed.), Progressivism

　　and education(pp. 53-76). Taipei: Shi-ta.〕

林玉体（譯）（2000）。民主與教育（原作者：J. Dewey出版）。臺北市：師大書苑。（原著出版於19

　　16年）Lin, Y.-T. (Trans.)(2000). Democracy and education (Author: J. Dewey). Taipei: Shi-ta.

　　(Originally published 1916)〕

張建成（2002）。批判的教育社會學研究。台北市：學富。

〔Chan, C.-C.(2002). A study of critical sociology of education. Taipei: Pro-ed.〕

教育部（1948a）。小學程課標準。南京市：作者。

〔Ministry of Education (1948a). Curriculum Standard for Elementary School. Nanking: Author.〕

教育部（1948b）。修訂中學程課標準。南京市：作者。

〔Ministry of Education (1948b). Revised Curriculum Standard for High School. Nanking: Author.〕

教育部（1975）。國民小學課程標準。臺北市：正中。

〔Ministry of Education (1975). Curriculum Standard for Elementary School. Taipei: Cheng-chung.〕

教育部（1983）。國民中學課程標準總綱。臺北市：正中。

〔Ministry of Education (1983). Curriculum Standard for Junior High School. Taipei: Cheng-chung.〕

教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-7944,

　　c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw

〔Ministry of Education (2014). Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education-General Guidelines.

　　Retrieved from https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-7944,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw.〕

陳佩英、簡菲莉（2015）。揚帆啟航、駛向碧海藍天。載於陳佩英、簡菲莉（執行編輯）。高中優質化

　　藍海航程紀實（頁iii-ix）。臺北市：高教出版社。

〔Chen, P.-Y., & Chien, F.-L. (2015). Setting sail for the blue sea and the azure sky. In Chen, P.-Y., &

　　Chien,F.-L. (Eds.), The collection of the reports of blue-ribbon high schools (pp. iii-ix). Taipei: Higher

　　education.〕

陳露茜、李朝陽（譯）（2010）。美國教育史：一場偉大的美國實驗（原作者：L. D. Webb）。合肥

　　市：安徽教育出版社。（原著出版於2006年）

〔Chen, R.-C., & Li, T.-Y. (Trans.)(2010). The history of American education: A Great American

　　Experiment (Author: L. D. Webb). Hefei: Anhui Education Press. (Originally published 2006)〕

單文經（2013）。杜威《經驗與教育》一書蘊含的教育改革理念。教育學刊，40，1-35。

〔Shan, W.-J. (2015). The ideals of education reform revealed in John Dewey’s Experience and

　　education.Educational Review, 40, 1-35)

單文經（2015）。經驗與教育（六十周年重新譯注本）。臺北市：聯經。

〔Shan, W.-J. (2015). Experience and education (The translation and annotation of the 60th

　　anniversary edition. Taipei: Linking.〕

單文經（2017）。解析杜威有關工作活動（Occupations）的主張。課程與教學季刊，20(2)，139-164。

〔Shan, W.-J. (2017). An analysis of John Dewey’s theory of occupations. Curriculum and Instruction

　　Quarterly, 20(2), 139-164.〕

單文經（2020）。在十二年國教課綱「總綱」中遇見杜威。當代教育研究，28(2)，1-29。

〔Meeting John Dewey in the Directions for Curriculum Guidelines of 12- Year Basic Education.

　　Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 28(2), 1-29.〕

賈馥茗（1983）。教育哲學。臺北市：三民。

〔Chia, F.-M. (1983). Philosophy of education. Taipei: San-Min.〕

Ackerman, D. B. (2003). Taproots for a new century: Tapping the best of traditional and progressive

　　education. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(5), 344-349.

Bode, B. H. (1938). Progressive education at the crossroads. New York, NY: Newson.

Church, R. L., & Sedlak, M. W. (1976). Education in the United States: An interpretative history. New

　　York, NY: Free.

Cohen, R. D., & Mohl, R. A. (1979). The paradox of progressive education: The Gary plan and urban

　　schooling. Port Washington, NY: National University Publications.

Cohen, S. (1999). Challenging orthodoxies: Towards a new cultural history of education. New York, NY:

　　Peter Lang.

Cremin, L. A. (1961). The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education, 1876-1957.

　　New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

Cremin, L. A. (1988). American education: The metropolitan experience, 1876-1980. New York, NY:

　　Harper & Row.

Cuban, L. (1984). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890-1980.

　　New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890-1990

　　(2nd.ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Experience and Education: Implication for teaching and schooling today.

　　In John Dewey, Experience and education, The 60th anniversary edition (pp. 150-167). West

　　Lafayette, IN: Kappa Delta Pi.

Dewey, J. (1952). Introduction. In E. R. Clapp, The use of resources in education.（pp. vii-xi）. New

　　York, NY: Harper.

Evans, R. W. (2020). Fears and schooling: Understanding the troubled history of progressive education.

　　New York, NY: Routledge.

Gordon, T. (1986). Democracy in one school?: Progressive education and restructuring. London, UK:

　　Falmer Press.

Graham, P. A. (1967). Progressive education: From arcady to academe: A history of the Progressive

　　Education Association, 1919-1955. New York, NY: Teachers College.

Hirsch, E. Jr. (1996). The schools we need and why we don’t have them. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Hu, Shih. (1968). The political philosophy of instrumentalism. In S. Ratner (Ed.), Philosopher of the

　　Common Man (pp. 205-209). New York, NY: Greenwood.

Kliebard, H. M. (1986). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958. New York, NY:

　　RoutledgeFalmer.

Kliebard, H. M. (1995). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958 (2nd ed.). New York, NY:

　　RoutledgeFalmer.

Kliebard, H. M. (2004). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958 (3rd ed.). New York, NY:

　　RoutledgeFalmer.

Kridel, C. (2000). Books of the century catalog. Columbia, SC: The University of South Carolina

　　Museum of Education.

Krug, E. A. (1964). The shaping of the American high school, 1880–1920. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

Krug, E. A. (1972). The shaping of the American high school, Vol. II, 1920–1941. Madison, WI:

　　University of Wisconsin Press.

Labaree, D. (2004). The trouble with Ed Schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Labaree, D. (2005). Progressivism, schools and schools of education: An American romance.

　　Paedagogica Historica, 41(1&2), 275-288.

Labaree, D. (2012). Someone has to fail :The zero-sum game of public schooling. Cambridge, MA:

　　Harvard University Press.

Levine, B. (2016). Works about John Dewey, 1886-2016 [electronic resource].Carbondale, IL: Southern

　　Illinois University Press.

Loss, C. G., & Loss, C.P. (2003). Progressive education movement. In J.W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia

　　of Education(2nd ed.)(Vol. 5, 1933-1938). New York, NY: MacMillan.

Martin, J. E. (2018). School was our life: Remembering progressive education. Bloomington, IN: Indiana

　　University Press.

Puckett, J. L., & Johanek, M. C. (2021). American education reform: History, policy, practice. Retrieved

　　from https://www.coursera.org/learn/edref#syllabus

Ravitch, D. (1983). The troubled crusade: American education, 1945-1980. New York, NY: Basic.

Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back: A century of failed school reforms. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Rousmaniere, K. (2013). The principal's office: A social history of the American school principal. Albany,

　　NY: State University of New York Press.

Rury, J. L. (2002). Education and social change: Themes in the history of American schooling. Mahwah,

　　NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

Rury, J. L. (2005). Education and social change: Themes in the history of American schooling (2nd ed.).

　　Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

Rury, J. L. (2016). Education and social change: Contours in the history of American schooling (5th ed.).

　　New York, NY: Routledge.

Russell, J. (2013). Characteristics of contemporary U.S. progressive middle schools (Unpublished

　　Doctoral Dissertation). Antioch University, Yellow Springs, Ohio.

Spring, J. (1972). Education and the rise of the corporate state. Boston, MA: Beacon.

Stengel, B. S. (2010). Progressive education. In Hunt, Thomas C., Carper, James C., Lasley, Thomas

　　J., & Raisch C Daniel. (2010). Encyclopedia of educational reform and dissent(pp. 735-742).

　　Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Tyack, D. B. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA:

　　Harvard University Press.

Urban, W., & Wagoner, J. (1996). American education: A history. Boston, MA: McGraw-hill.

Urban, W., & Wagoner, J. (2014). American education: A history (5th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-hill.

Webb, L. D. (2006). The history of American education: A great American experiment. Upper Saddle

　　River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Zilversmit, A. (1993). Changing schools: Progressive education theory and practice, 1930–1960.

　　Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

 

《杜威全集》資料庫（The Collected Works of John Dewey, 1882-1953 [L. Hickman, Ed.]. Electronic Edition.

　　Charlottesville, VA, Intelex Corp.）

 

EW5:54-83        〔1897a〕   Ethical principles underlying education.

EW5:84-95        〔1897b〕My pedagogic creed.

MW4:266-293   〔1909〕  Moral principle in education.

MW5                  〔1908〕  Ethics(with James H. Taft).

MW6:177-356   〔1910〕  How we think.

MW7:152-199   〔1913〕  Interest and effort in education

MW8:205-404   〔1915〕  School of tomorrow.

MW9                  〔1916a〕   Democracy and education.

MW10:234-243 〔1916b〕Progress.

LW3:257-268    〔1928〕  Progressive education and the science of education.

LW5:3-40          〔1929〕  The sources of a science of education.

LW5:289-298    〔1930a〕Philosophy and education.

LW5:319-325    〔1930b〕How much freedom in new schools?

LW9:147-167    〔1931〕 The way out of educational confusion.

LW8:107-352    〔1933a〕 How we think?

LW9:147-167    〔1933b〕 Why have progressive schools?

LW9:194-204    〔1934〕 The need for a philosophy of education.

LW11:3-65         〔1935〕  Liberalism and social action.

LW11:407-417   〔1937〕 Education and social change.

LW12                 〔1938a〕 Logic.

LW13:3-63        〔1938b〕 Experience and education.

LW14:91-97      〔1939〕 I believe.

SV1:248-250    〔1947〕  Attracting the best minds to teaching, Interview by Benjamin Fine.

SV1: 261-263   〔1949〕  Dewey sees ripe old age ahead, Interview by David Taylor Marke.

SV1:266-268     〔1951〕  Task of educators. （Interviewed by Benjamin Fine）

 

全文下載