第五十二輯．第ㄧ期 - 2006-06-30

建立課程的公共性── 課程公共論述的危機與出路

The Crisis in Public Discourse Regarding the Curriculum and its Resolution

作　者：
歐用生 / Yung-Sheng Ou
關鍵字：
課程、公共論述、後現代社會 / curriculum, public discourse, postmodern society
  • 摘要
  • 英文摘要
  • 參考文獻
  • 全文下載
當前臺灣課程論述表面上非常蓬勃，但實質上缺少公共論述的覺醒。課程在 本質上是道德的理解，是公共的、文化的、批判的工作，而課程工作者是公共的、 道德的知識份子，所以課程必須關心公共的善，要加強課程的公共論述。但在後 現代社會中，全球化的浪潮、新科技的應用、網路文化的滲透、企業文化的侵蝕、 知識經濟的衝擊，徹底改變了課程對話的平臺。尤其是新自由主義和新保守主義 的課程政策，在企業化、市場化和私有化的邏輯下，教育被「非政治化」了，課 程政策被排除於公共論辯或公共領域之外，任由「看不見的手」操控或宰制。結 果，市場重於社區，個人的利益凌駕公共的善，消費者權超越市民權，課程公共 論述面臨了前所未有的危機。本文正視這個議題，先分析當代歐美脈絡中課程公 共論述的危機，然後探討加強公共論述的途徑，作為國內課程研究的參考。
In this postmodern society driven by the forces of globalization, ever-advancing high tech, the internet culture, business culture and knowledge-based economy, the curriculum discourse platform has undergone a drastic change. Within the logic of capitalization, marketization and privatization, and as curriculum policies are increasingly characterized by neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism, education has been “depoliticized.” Curriculum policies have been excluded from public discourse and subjected to control by “an invisible hand.” Market orientation has taken precedence over community orientation; the private good (i.e. private or individual profit) has taken precedence over the public good, and consumer rights have taken priority over civil rights. To investigate this phenomenon, the present paper first analyzes the current crisis of public curriculum discourse within the contemporary Euro-American context. It then addresses the strategies for strengthening public discourse. In so doing, the paper aims to pave the way for more extensive and more “current” curriculum research in Taiwan.
Apple, M. W. (1993). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New
York: Routledge.
Apple, M. W. (1996). Cultural politics and education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Apple, M. W. (2001). Educating the right way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality. New
York: Routledge.
Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cibulka, J. M. (1999). Moving toward an accountability system of K-12 education: Alternative
approach and challenge. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Handbook of educational policy (pp. 92-102).
London: Academic Press.
Dale, M. (2004). Tales in and out of school. In D. Liston & J. Garrison (Eds.), Teaching, learning,
and loving: Reclaiming passion in educational practice (pp. 65-84). New York:
Routledge.
Darder, A. (2005). Schooling and culture of dominion: Unmasking the ideology of standardized
testing. In G. E. Fischman, P. McLaren, H. Sunker, & C. Lankshear (Eds.), Critical theories,
radical pedagogies, and global conflicts (pp. 207-222). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Dillabough, J. (2000). Degrees of freedom and deliberations of “self”: The gendering of identity
in teaching. In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), Revolutionary pedagogies: Culture politics, instituting
education, and the discourse of theory: (pp. 312-351). New York: Routledge.
Elbaz-Luwisch, F. (2005). Teachers voices: Storytelling and possibility. Greewich, CT: Information
Age.
Elliott, J. (1998). The curriculum experiment- Meeting the challenge of social change. Buckingham,
England: Open University Press.
Ferneding, K. (2004). The discourse of inevitability and the forging of an emergent social vision:
Technology diffusion and the dialectic of educational reform discourse. In W. M. Reynolds 
& J. A. Webber (Eds.), Expending curriculum theory: Dis/position and lines of flight (pp.
47-63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fischman, G. E., & McLaren, P. (2005). Is there any space for hope? Teacher education and social
justice in the age of globalization and terror. In G. E. Fischman, P. McLaren, H. Sunker,
& C. Lankshear (Eds.), Critical theories, radical pedagogies, and global conflicts (pp.
343-358). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Fine, M., & Weis, L. (2003). Introduction: Silenced voices and extraordinary conversations. In
M. Fine & L. Weis (Eds.), Silenced voices and extraordinary conversations: Re-imagining
school (pp. 1-8). New York: Teachers College Press.
Freire, P. (1975). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin Books.
Giroux, H. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. New York:
Bergin & Garvey.
Giroux, H (1992). Educational leadership and the crisis of democratic government. Educational
Researcher, 5, 4-11.
Giroux, H. A. (2000). Postmodern education and disposable youth. In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), Revolutionary
pedagogies: Cultrure politics, instituting education, and the discourse of theory
(pp. 174-195). New York: Routledge.
Giroux, H. A. (2004). Proto-Fascism in America: Neoliberalism and demise of democracy.
Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Giroux, H. A. (2005). War talk and the shredding of the social contract: Youth and the politics of
domestic militarization. In G. E. Fischman, P. Mclaren, H. Sunker, & C. Lankshear (Eds.),
Critical theories, radical pedagogies, and global conflicts (pp. 52-68). New York: Rowman
& Littlefield.
Greene, M. (1978). Landscapes of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Greene, M. (2001). Variations on a blue guitar: The Lincoln Center Institute lectures on aesthetics
education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Grumet, M. R. (1988). Bitter milk: Women and teaching. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts
Press.
Huber, B. R., & Schofield J. W. (1998). I like computers, but many girls don’t: Gender and sociocultural
context of computing. In H. Bromley & M. W. Apple (Eds.), Educa-
tion/technology/power: Educational computing as a social practice (pp. 103-131). New
York: State University of New York Press.
Kellner, D. (2000). Multiple literacies and critical pedagogy. In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), Revolutionary
pedagogies: Culture politics, instituting education, and the discourse of theory (pp.
196-221). New York: Routledge.
Kellner, D. (2005). Globalization, September 11, and the restructuring of education. In G. E.
Fischman, P. Mclaren, P. H. Sunker, & C. Lankshear (Eds.), Critical theories, radical
pedagogies, and global conflicts (pp. 87-112). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kincheloe, J. L. (1999). Critical democracy and education. In J. G. Henderson & K. R. Kesson
(Eds.), Understanding democratic curriculum leadership (pp. 73-80). New York: Teachers
College Press.
Lee, J. C. K., Lo, L. N. K., & Walker, A. (2004). Partnership and change for school change. In J.
C. K. Lee, L. N. K. Lo, & A. Walker (Eds.), Partnership and change: Toward school
development (pp. 1-30). Hong Kong, P. R. C.: The Chinese University Press.
Liston, D., & Garrison J. (2004). Introduction: Love revived and examined. In D. Liston & J.
Garrison (Eds.), Teaching, learning, and loving: Reclaiming passion in educational practice
(pp. 1-19). New York: Routledge.
McLaren, P., & Hammer, R. (1996). Media knowledges, warrior citizenry, and postmodern literacies.
In H. Girous, C. Landshear, P. McLaren, & M. Peters (Eds.), Counternarratives:
Cultural stndies and critical pedagogies in postmodern space (pp. 81-115). New York:
Routledge.
McNeil, L. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational cost of standardized testing.
New York: RKP.
Pinar, W. F. (2004a). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pinar, W. F. (2004b). The problem of public. In R. A. Gaztambide-Fernandez & J. T. Sears (Eds.),
Curriculum work as a public moral enterprise (pp. 129-126). New York: Rowan & Littlefield.
 
Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum:
An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary discourses. New York: Peter
Lang.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2003). Governing the child and pedagogicalization of the parent: A historical
excursus into the present. In M. N. Bloch, K. Holmlund, I. Moqvist, & T. S. Popkewitz, 
(Eds.), Governing children, families and education (pp. 35-61). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
 
Popkewitz, T. S. (2004). Partnership, the social pact and changing systems of season in a comparative
perspective. In B. M. Franklin, M. N. Bloch, & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Educational
partnership and the state: The paradoxes of governing schools, children, and families
(pp. 27-54). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reynolds, W. M. (2004). To touch the clouds standing on top of a maytag refrigeratior:
Brand-name postmodernity and a Deleuze in-between. In W. M. Reynolds & J. A. Webber
(Eds.), Expending curriculum theory: Dis/position and lines of flight (pp. 19-33). Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sears, J. T. (2004). The curriculum worker as public moral intellectual. In R. A. Gaztambide-Fernandez
& J. T. Sears (Eds.), Curriculum work as a public moral enterprise (pp.
1-13). New York: Rowan & Littlefield.
Slattery, P. (2003). Hermeneutics, subjectivity, and aesthetics: Internationalizing the interpretive
process in U. S. curriculum research. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum
research (pp. 651-665). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Suoranta, J., Tomperi, T., & FitzSimmons, R. (2005). Revolutionary pedagogy in media culture:
Reading the thcho-capitalist order of education. In G. E. Fischman, P. Mclaren, H. Sunker,
& C. Lankshear (Eds.), Critical theories, radical pedagogies, and global conflicts (pp.
185-206). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Wegwert, J. (2004). Bating the discourses of fear and containment in schooling and teacher
education. In T. S. Poetter, T. L. Goodney, & J. L. Bird (Eds.), Critical perspectives on the
curriculum of teacher education (pp. 155-176). New York: University Press of America.
Whitty, G. (1997). Marketization, the state, and the re-formation of the teaching profession. In A.
H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, society.
(pp. 299-310). New York: Oxford University Press.
Whitty, G. (2002). Making sense of education policy: Studies in the sociology and politics of
education. London: Paul Chapman.
Young, M. F. D. (1998). The curriculum of the future: From the new sociology of education to a
critical theory of learning. London: Falmer.