第六十八輯．第一期（Open Access） - 2022-03-31

誰是重考生？以全國考招資料檢視重考趨勢、考生特質及領域偏好

Who Are the Exam-Retakers? Investigating Retaker’s Trend, Demographic Characteristics and Field Preferences Ｕsing Administrative Data

作　者：
王淑貞、陳婉琪 / Shu-Chen Wang, Wan-Chi Chen
關鍵字：
大學入學考試、行政資料、重考生 / college entrance examination, administrative data, exam-retakers
  • 摘要
  • 英文摘要
  • 參考文獻
  • 全文下載
　　本研究串接大考中心及招生委員會聯合會之行政資料進行加值應用分析，以「高中畢業三年內重考」為定義，初探重考趨勢、重考生特質與科系偏好之整體圖像，得到數點結論：一、近三年重考率確有增加，但實際數據未如媒體報導誇張。二、學測總級分偏高、男生的重考率較高；而家戶收入低者，重考率較低。三畢業於平均程度越好的高中、或都市化程度越高地區，重考機率越高；來自南部的考生重考率略高。四、三種主要入學管道的重考率有差異。五、重考率最高之三領域為「醫藥衛生及社會福利領域」、「農業、林業、漁業及獸醫領域」、「自然科學、數學及統計領域」。比起輿論批評的「教改無法達到適性教育」，社會競爭論更能解釋重考行為。此外，輿論曾出現的「挑桃子」比喻，亦相當值得留意——指考錄取的考生，未必是壞桃子，但就讀穩定度可能最差。
　　Using the administrative data from College Entrance Examination Center, this study investigates retaking trends, demographic characteristics and field preference. Findings include: (1)There is indeed an increasing trend of exam-retaking since 2018. (2) Generally speaking, those who score higher have higher retaking rate than those who score lower do; males are more likely to become retakers than females; students from low-income families have lower retaking rate. (3) Students from urban areas or from high schools with higher mean scores have higher retaking rate; students from Southern Taiwan have a slightly higher rate of exam-retaking. (4) Comparing three college-entrance channel, first-time takers who got admitted through the last channel (examination and allocation) have much higher retaking rate than those admitted through the other two channels (star program and admission via application program). (5) Comparing the fields of first-time takers who got admitted in, the top three fields with highest retaking rate are: "Medicine, Health and Social Welfare", "Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary Medicine" and "Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics". Overall, exam-retaking is more likely to be related to severe competition for certain "dream departments", especially medicine.

大學入學考試中心（2020）。指定科目考試之報名人數統計總表。取自

　　https://www.ceec.edu.tw/xmdoc?xsmsid=0J018611000723433352

[College Entrance Examination Center. (2020). Advanced subjects test registration volumes. Retrieved from

　　https://www.ceec.edu.tw/xmdoc?xsmsid=0J018611000723433352]

中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心（2014）。2014年台灣鄉鎮市區類型之研析。取自

　　https://survey.sinica.edu.tw/research/document/01_2_2014.pdf

[Center for Survey Research, Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica. (2014). The

　　research and analysis on typed of township-level in Taiwan, 2014. Retrieved from https://survey.sinica.edu.

　　tw/research/document/01_2_2014.pdf]

全國十二年國教家長聯盟（2019，4月18日）。面對史上最黑箱、最混亂甄試 家長怒罵招聯會不顧學生死

　　活。取自https://www.facebook.com/groups/536370659727299/permalink/2443910702306609/

[National 12-Year Basic Education Parent Associations. (2019, April 18). Face most blackbox, most orderless

　　entrance exam in history, parents blame Joint Board of College Recruitment Commission ignore students.

　　Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/groups/536370659727299/permalink/2443910702306609/]

羊正鈺（2019，5月24日）。教育部提多元入學的學生「表現較好」 國教盟：考試分發名額由民情決定。

　　關鍵評論。取自https://www.thenewslens.com/article/119711

[Yang, C.-Y. (2019, May 24). MOE mention students who in multi-tracks system of recruitment get better

　　performance, National Basic Education Action Coalition: Quotas of Joint College Entrance Examination Are

　　Decided by Public Opinion. The News Lens. Retrieved from https://www.thenewslens.com/article/119711]

吳尚軒（2019，6月10日）。刺青大師幹嘛念經濟？大學「志趣不合」休退學人數攀升學生嘆：像只看名

　　字，就決定跟這個人交往4年。風傳媒。取自https://www.storm. mg/article/1356835?page=1

[Wu, S.-H. (2019, June 10). Why should a master Tattooist study economic? College incompatible interest,

　　Dropout number go high. Student: Just check the name and decide the relationship within four years. The

　　Strom Media. Retrieved from https://www.storm. mg/article/1356835?page=1]

吳尚軒（2020，6月29日）。要是能重來⋯⋯指考重考生連2年破2成 現行考招制度學子能找到命中所愛？

　　風傳媒。取自https://www.storm.mg/article/2802755?page=1

[Wu, S.-H. (2020, June 29). If I could retake... Advanced subjects test retakers are more than 20% two years in a

　　row. Could students find what they love in current college recruitment entrance examination system? The

　　Strom Media. Retrieved from https://www.storm.mg/ article/2802755?page=1]

吳柏軒、黃以敬（2017，3月10日）。大數據說話 繁星生上大學表現優。自由時報。取自https://news.ltn.

　　com.tw/news/life/paper/1084545?fbclid=IwAR1aKPQQdnW3G5NOw W5HwUmN8ynflkOivgYo5T3iA7c

　　k1coR3FiMdPGT_m8

[Wu, P.-H., & Huang, Y.-J. (2017, March 10). Let big data speak, multi-star project students get better

　　performance. The Liberty Times. Retrieved from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/1084545?fbclid=

　　IwAR1aKPQQdnW3G5NOwW5HwUmN8ynflkOivgYo5T3iA7ck1c oR3FiMdPGT_m8]

吳聰敏（1988）。大學教育之需求與大學聯考重考的現象。經濟論文叢刊，16（2），197-224。

[Wu, T.-M. (1988). Demand in college education and phenomenon of college entrance examination retake. Taiwan

　　Economic Review, 16(2), 197-224.]

呂雨珊（2016）。高四重考班在臺灣教育價值中的角色之探析。台灣教育，700，47- 51。

[Lu, Y.-S. (2016). An analysis of the role of senior high school Grade four re-examination class in Taiwan

　　education value. Taiwan Education Review, 700, 47-51.]

李維倫、古慧雯、駱明慶、林明仁（2020）。入學管道與學習表現。經濟論文叢刊，48（1），31-76。

　　https://doi.org/10.6277/TER.202003_48(1).0002

[Lee, W.-L., Koo, H.-W., Luoh, M.-C., & Lin, M.-J. (2020). Multi-channel admission and academic achievement.

　　Taiwan Economic Review, 48(1), 31-76. https://doi.org/10.6277/ TER.202003_48(1).0002]

林志成（2020，1月6日）。學測重考生激增 教團要求提高指考入學比例。中時新聞網。取自https://www.

　　chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20200106001617-260405?chdtv

[Lin, C.-C. (2020, January 6). General scholastic ability test retakers increase sharply, educational organizations

　　ask improve ratio of Advanced Subjects Test enrollment. China Times. Retrieved from https://www.

　　chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20200106001617- 260405?chdtv]

林曉慧、沈志明（2020，8月15日）。大學入學 考試分發占比越來越低。公視新聞網。

　　取自https://news.pts.org.tw/article/490715

[Lin, H.-H., & Shen, C.-M. (2020, August 15). University enrollment ratio through advanced subjects test is

　　getting lower. PTS News. Retrieved from https://news.pts.org.tw/ article/490715]

林曉雲、洪美秀（2015，9月21日）。先搶先贏空佔名額／3百台成大新生休學重考。自由時報。取自

　　https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/917274

[Lin, H.-Y., & Hung, M.-H. (2015, September 21). First come, first served, occupy the quota. Three hundred

　　NTU and NCKU freshmen quit and resit. The Liberty Times. Retrieved from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/

　　focus/paper/917274]

秦宛萱（2019，12月22日）。追求夢幻校系還是考招變革？109學測重考生佔比創14年新高。信傳媒。

　　取自https://www.cmmedia.com.tw/home/articles/19127

[Qin, W.-X. (2019, December 22). Chasing dreaming universities and departments or the reform of college

　　entrance examination? Ratio of general scholastic ability test retakers spiked to a fourteen-year high in 2019.

　　CredereMedia. Retrieved from https://www.cmmedia.com.tw/ home/articles/19127]

教育部（2021a）。中華民國教育統計（110年版）。取自https://www.edu.tw/News_Content. aspx?n=829446

　　EED325AD02&sms=26FB481681F7B203&s=B19AF3B0B4D7BFAC

[Ministry of Education. (2021a). Education statistics The Republic of China. Retrieved from https://www.edu.tw/

　　News_Content.aspx?n=829446EED325AD02&sms=26FB481681F7B 203&s=B19AF3B0B4D7BFAC]

教育部（2021b）。高級中等以下學校實驗教育概況。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/statedu/ chart.aspx?pvalue

　　=51

[Ministry of Education. (2021b). A glance at experimental education high schools and lower level schools.

　　Retrieved from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/statedu/chart.aspx?pvalue=51]

教育部統計處（2017）。中華民國學科標準分類第5次修正（106年9月）。取自https:// stats.moe.gov.tw/

　　files/bcode/106bcode.pdf

[Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education. (2017). Republic of China standard classification of subjects (the

　　fifth revised edition). Retrieved from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/ files/bcode/106bcode.pdf]

章凱閎（2020，5月27日）。國教盟籲增指考分發名額，教部冷回應。聯合新聞網。取自https://udn.com/

　　news/story/6925/4592846

[Zhang, K.-H. (2020a, May 27). National Basic Education Action Coalition appeal to increase enrollment quotas

　　through Advanced Subjects Test, MOE cold response. United Daily News. Retrieved from https://udn.com/

　　news/story/6925/4592846]

銀慶貞、陶宏麟、洪嘉瑜（2015）。由大學多元入學者的個人背景與滿意度評估多元入 學的成效。應用

　　經濟論叢，98，1-53。

[Yin, C.-C., Tao, H.-L., & Hung, C.-Y. (2015). Evaluation of college multi-channel admission system in Taiwan

　　based on individual background and satisfaction level. Taiwan Journal of Applied Economics, 98, 1-53.]

劉子維（2020，7月19日）。大學隨便考隨便讀？指考重考人數創10年新高。READr+。取自https://www.

　　readr.tw/post/2457

[Liu, T.-W. (2020, July 19). Random exam and casual study? Retakers in advanced subjects test of college

　　entrance examination reached to a ten-year high. READr+. Retrieved from https://www.readr.tw/post/2457]

潘乃欣（2020，6月30日）。不願忍4年 指考重考生首度逾2成。聯合新聞網。取自 https://ptt-web.com/

　　Gossiping/M.1592559299.A.681

[Pan, N.-H. (2020, June 30). Unwilling to endure 4 years. Advanced subjects test retakers first exceed 20%.

　　United Daily News. Retrieved from https://ptt-web.com/Gossiping/ M.1592559299.A.681]

簡立欣（2020，1月17日）。學測怪現象！每7人竟有1人重考。旺報。取自https://www. chinatimes.com/

　　realtimenews/20200117002368-260405?chdtv

[Jian, L.-S. (2020, January 17). Strange phenomenon in general scholastic ability test! There is one retaker per 7

　　examinee. Want Daily. Retrieved from ttps://www.chinatimes.com/ realtimenews/20200117002368-260405?

　　chdtv]

Connelly, R., Playford, C. P., Gayle, V., & Dibben, C. (2016). The Role of administrative data in the big data

　　revolution in social science research. Social Science Research, 59, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.

　　2016.04.015

Figlio, D., Karbownik, K., & Salvanes, K. G. (2016). Education research and administrative data. In E. A.

　　Hanushek, S. J. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 5, pp. 75-

　　138). North Holland, Netherlands: Elsevier.

Frisancho, V., Krishna, K., Lychagin, S., & Yavas, C. (2016). Better luck next time: Learning through retaking.

　　Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 125, 120-135.

Goodman, J., Gurantz, O., & Smith, J. (2020). Take two! SAT retaking and college enrollment gaps. American

　　Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12(2), 115-158.

Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation.

　　Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Krishna, K., Lychagin, S., & Frisancho, V. (2018). Retaking in high stakes exams: Is less more? International

　　Economic Review, 59(2), 449-477.

Thomas, M. K. (2004). Seeking every advantage: The phenomenon of taking both the SAT and ACT. Economics

　　of Education Review, 23(2), 203-208.

Törnkvist, B., & Henriksson, W. (2004). Repeated test taking: Differences between social groups. Retrieved from

　　http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-9780

Woollard, M. (2014). Administrative data: Problems and benefits. A perspective from the United Kingdom. In A.

　　Duşa, D. Nelle, G. Stock, & G. G. Wagner (Eds.), Facing the future: European research infrastructures for the

　　humanities and social sciences (pp. 49-61). Berlin, Germany: SCIVERO.

 

 

全文下載