本研究除分析我國自1994年以來之師資培育發展,諸如從解除管制、標準本位到證據本位之變化,更採取後結構取向之本體論政治觀點,指出主流師資培育研究方法的工具性思維傾向,進而透過「師資培育理念的矛盾化」、「師資素質管理的技術化」,以及「師資培育課程意識型態的再概化」等議題之討論,開展非工具性思維的觀察與批評。最後,本研究從師資培育政策轉折與現況、當前政策的下一步挑戰,以及後結構取向教育研究之價值等提出結論與後續研究建議,期能為我國師資培育改革30年回顧與展望提供不一樣的視角。
This study first analyses the development of teacher education in Taiwan since 1994, such as the changes from deregulation, standards-based to evidence-based, and adopts a post-structural perspective of ontological politics to point out the instrumental thinking tendency of mainstream teacher education research methods. Secondly, non-instrumental thinking is examined and criticized through discussions on topics such as “the contradiction of teacher education ideas,” “technicalisation of teacher quality management,” and “re-conception of teacher education curriculum ideology.” Finally this study presents conclusions and follow-up suggestions regarding the transition and current situation of teacher education, the future challenges of current teacher education policies, and the value of post-structural education research. The author anticipates providing a different perspective on Taiwan’s teacher education development in the past 30 years.
111年度上半年大學校院師資培育評鑑結果公布(2022)。大學校院師資培育評鑑資訊
網。https://proj.moe.edu.tw/tece.heeact/News_Content.aspx?n=3117&s=10059
[The results of teacher education universities’ evaluation in the first half of 2011. (2022).
Teacher Education University Evaluation Information Network. https://proj.moe.edu.tw/
tece.heeact/News_Content.aspx?n=3117&s=10059]
毛連塭(1990)。師範學院目標及課程研究。載於中華民國師範教育學會(主編),師
範教育政策與問題(頁83-122)。師大書苑。
[Mao, L.-W. (1990). A study of teachers college objectives and curriculum. In Chinese Teacher
Education Society (Ed.), Teacher education policies and issues (pp. 83-122). Lucky
Bookstore.]
王俊斌(2011)。「良師典範」理念之合理性析辨。教育資料與研究,102,19-44。
[Wang, C.-P. (2011). An analysis of the legitimate foundation of the “Mentor model”.
Educational Resources and Research, 102, 19-44.]
王俊斌(2015)。符合「標準」就是專業?關於「標準本位」的理念迷思及其實踐弔
詭。載於吳清基、黃嘉莉(主編),《師資培育法》:20年的回顧與前瞻(頁141-
167)。中華民國師範教育學會。
[Wang, C.-P. (2015). Does meeting “standards” mean professional? Regarding the conceptual
myth of “standards-based” and its practical paradoxes. In C.-J. Wu & J.-L. Huang (Eds.),
Teacher Education Act: Review and prospect over the past 20 (pp. 141-167). Chinese
Teacher Education Society.]
王俊斌(2021)。師資培育課程基準改革之後:素養導向、能力發展與新教師專業。台
灣教育研究期刊,2(6),55-77。
[Wang, C.-P. (2021). After the curriculum benchmark reform of teacher education:
Competencies-orientation, capabilities approach, and new teacher profession. Journal of
Taiwan Education Studies, 2(6), 55-77.]
王俊斌(2022)。社會變遷下「未來」臺灣學校教育想像—後全球化狀況的觀察。載
於楊洲松、王俊斌(主編),2050臺灣教育願景—教育價值與學校功能的重建
(頁85-118)。學富。
[Wang, C.-P. (2022). “Future” imagination of Taiwan school education under social changes
context– An observation of post-globalization conditions. In C.-S. Yang & C.-P. Wang
(Eds.), Vision of Taiwan education in 2050– Reconstruction of educational values and
school functions (pp. 85-118). Pro-ED.]
王俊斌(2023)。配合108課綱職前師資培育課程基準的階段性問題。臺灣教育評論月
刊,12(3),1-3。
[Wang, C.-P. (2023). Problems of pre-service teacher education course benchmarks in line with
curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education. Taiwan Education Review Monthly,
12(3), 1-3.]
王家通(1998)。我國師資培育問題的比較教育學分析。載於沈慶揚、陳慶瑞、蔡清
華、顏素霞(主編),師資培育與教育研究(頁1-28)。復文圖書。
[Wang, C.-T. (1998). A comparative analysis of teacher education issues in Taiwan. In C.-Y
Shen, C.-R. Chen, C.-H. Tsai, & S.-H. Yen (Eds.), Teacher education and educational
research (pp. 1-28). Fu Wen Books.]
卯靜儒(2004)。從新馬克斯到後結構主義—課程社會學研究的再概念化。教育研究
集刊,50(1),119-142。https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200403_(50-1).0005
[Mao, C.-J. (2004). From neo-marxism to post-structuralism: Reconceptualizing sociological
studies of curriculum. Bulletin of Educational Research, 50(1), 119-142. https://doi.org/
10.6910/BER.200403_(50-1).0005]
四一○教改聯盟(1996)。四一○教改聯盟致教改會政策說帖。國家文化記憶庫。https://
memory.culture.tw/Home/Detail?Id=312830&IndexCode=Culture_Event#&gid=pswg-
forced&pid=1
[410 Educational Reform Alliance. (1996). 410 educational reform alliance’s policy statement
to the Educational Reform Commission. National Cultural Memory Bank. https://
memory.culture.tw/Home/Detail?Id=312830&IndexCode=Culture_Event#&gid=pswg-
forced&pid=1
伍振鷟(1995)。「師資培育法」的變革與衝擊。載於中華民國師範教育學會(主
編),教師權利與責任(頁1-31)。師大書苑。
[Wu, Z.-J. (1995). The changes and impact of the “Teacher Education Act”. In Chinese
Teacher Education Society (Ed.), Teachers’ rights and responsibilities (pp. 1-31). Lucky
Bookstore.]
朱敬一、戴華(1996)。教育鬆綁。遠流。
[Zhu, C.-Y., & Dai, H. (1996). Educational de-regulation. Yuan-Liou.]
行政院教育改革審議委員會(1995)。行政院教育改革審議委員會第一期諮議報告書。
https://teric.naer.edu.tw/wSite/ct?ctNode=645&mp=teric_b&xItem=2048369&resCtNode=
454&OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=6O7C-VM4N-DQAP-ZXRK-IAHY-AYKJ-X622-FQM6
[Executive Yuan Education Reform Review Committee. (1995). The first consultation report
of the Executive Yuan Education Reform Review Committee. https://teric.naer.edu.tw/
wSite/ct?ctNode=645&mp=teric_b&xItem=2048369&resCtNode=454&OWASP_
CSRFTOKEN=6O7C-VM4N-DQAP-ZXRK-IAHY-AYKJ-X622-FQM6]
行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。https://teric.naer.edu.
tw/wSite/ct?ctNode=645&mp=teric_b&xItem=2048389&resCtNode=454&OWASP_
CSRFTOKEN=6O7C-VM4N-DQAP-ZXRK-IAHY-AYKJ-X622-FQM6
[Executive Yuan Education Reform Review Committee. (1996). General advisory report of
education reform. https://teric.naer.edu.tw/wSite/ct?ctNode=645&mp=teric_b&xItem=20
48389&resCtNode=454&OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=6O7C-VM4N-DQAP-ZXRK-IAHY-
AYKJ-X622-FQM6]
吳清山(2006)。師資培育的理念與實踐。教育研究與發展期刊,2(1),1-32。
[Wu, C.-S. (2006). The ideas and practice of teacher education. Journal of Educational Research
and Development, 2(1), 1-32.]
吳清基、黃嘉莉、張明文(2011)。我國師資培育政策回顧與展望。載於國家教育研究
院(主編),我國百年教育回顧與展望(頁1-20)。國家教育研究院。
[Wu, C.-J., Huang, J.-L., & Chang, M.-W. (2011). Review and prospects of Taiwan teacher
education policies. In National Academy for Educational Research (Ed.), Review and
prospects of centenary education in Taiwan (pp. 1-20). National Academy for Educational
Research.]
吳璧純、詹志禹(2018)。從能力本位到素養導向教育的演進、發展及反思。教育研究
與發展期刊,14(2),35-64。https://doi.org/10.3966/181665042018061402002
[Wu, P.-C., & Chan, J.-C. (2018). Reflecting on the perspective transformation of competency-
based education. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 14(2), 35-64. https://
doi.org/10.3966/181665042018061402002]
李奉儒(2008)。臺灣政治解嚴以來的教育改革論述分析。載於蘇永明、方永泉(主
編),解嚴以來臺灣教育改革的省思(頁1-29)。學富。
[Lee, F.-J. (2008). Analysis of the discourse on educational reform in Taiwan since the lifting of
political martial law. In Y.-M. Shu & Y.-C. Fang (Eds.), Reflections on Taiwan’s education
reform since the lifting of martial law (pp. 1-29). Pro-ED.]
李建興(2016)。質量並進:中小學師資培訓與發展(1997-2015)。載於臺灣教育發展
史—見證百年樹人的希望工程(頁218-245)。天下文化。
[Lee, C.-H. (2016). Moving forward with quality: Teacher training and development in primary
and secondary schools (1997-2015). In Witness the hope project of educational cultivation
for a century (pp. 218-245). CommonWealth.]
李園會(2001)。臺灣師範教育史。南天。
[Lee, Y.-H. (2001). A history of teacher education in Taiwan. Nantian.]
周愚文(2000)。影響我國近百年教育發展的重要教育改革評述。載於中國教育學會
(主編),跨世紀教育的回顧與前瞻(頁1-19)。揚智。
[Zhou, Y.-W. (2000). A review of important educational reforms over the past century in Taiwan.
In China Education Society (Ed.), Review and prospects of the education development for
next century (pp. 1-19). Yang-Chih Books.]
林生傳(2004)。台灣近期教育改革的透視與省思。教育學刊,23,1-35。
[Lin, S.-C. (2004). A retrospection and reflection on recent education reform in Taiwan.
Educational Review, 23, 1-35.]
紀金山(2008)。臺灣師資培育制度改革論述的社會分析。臺灣教育社會學研究,8
(2),47-85。
[Chi, C.-S. (2008). The social analysis of the discourses on teacher education in Taiwan. Taiwan
Journal of Sociology of Education, 8(2), 47-85.]
孫志麟(2009)。師資教育的未來:政策與實踐。學富。
[Sun, C.-L. (2009). The future of teacher education: Policy and practice. Pro-ED.]
財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會(2022)。111年度大學校院師資培育評鑑規劃與
實施計畫。https://tecs.otecs.ntnu.edu.tw/upload/psls/01_psls_plan/psls_plan_03/psls_
plan_03_11008.pdf
[Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan. (2022). The university
teacher education evaluation plan and implementation (2023). https://tecs.otecs.ntnu.edu.
tw/upload/psls/01_psls_plan/psls_plan_03/psls_plan_03_11008.pdf
財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會(2023)。113年起實施第四週期大學校院師資培育評
鑑規劃與實施計畫。https://tece.heeact.edu.tw/AnnualPlan.aspx?EvaluationType=1
[Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan. (2023). The fourth cycle
(starting in 2024) of university teacher education and evaluation plan and implementation.
https://tece.heeact.edu.tw/AnnualPlan.aspx?EvaluationType=1]
國立教育資料館(1994)。我國師範教育發展況與評估之研究。
[National Education Archives. (1994). Research on the development and evaluation of norm
education in Taiwan.]
張春興、張芬芬、張景媛、湯維玲(1989)。中小學師資培育制度改革意見之調查研
究。教育心理學報,22,23-48。
[Chang, C.-H., Chang, F.-F., Chang, C.-Y., & Tang, W.-L. (1989). A study of the opinions
regarding primary and secondary school teachers’ training system. Bulletin of Educational
Psychology, 22, 23-48.]
教育部(1994)。第七次全國教育會議實錄。
[Ministry of Education. (1994). Proceedings of the 7th National Education Conference.]
教育部(2006)。中華民國師資培育統計年報(94年版)。
[Ministry of Education. (2006). The Republic of China yearbook of teacher education statistics
(2005).]
教育部(2012a)。我國師資培育數量第二階段規劃方案。https://tec.ntut.edu.tw/var/file/
22/1022/img/88/127467987.pdf
[Ministry of Education. (2012a). The second phase of the program for the number of teachers
education in Taiwan. https://tec.ntut.edu.tw/var/file/22/1022/img/88/127467987.pdf]
教育部(2012b)。中華民國師資培育白皮書。https://teric.naer.edu.tw/wSite/
ct?ctNode=645&mp=teric_b&xItem=1904593
[Ministry of Education. (2012b). White paper on teacher education in the Republic of China.
https://teric.naer.edu.tw/wSite/ct?ctNode=645&mp=teric_b&xItem=1904593]
教育部(2012c)。中華民國師資培育統計年報(民國100年版)。
[Ministry of Education. (2012c). The Republic of China yearbook of teacher education statistics
(2011).]
教育部(2013)。師資職前教育課程教育專業課程科目及學分對照表實施要點。https://
edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001133#lawmenu
[Ministry of Education. (2013). Implementation directions of educational profession subjects
and credits comparison table for pre-service teacher education courses. https://edu.law.
moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001133#lawmenu]
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要—總綱。
[Ministry of Education. (2013). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: General
guidelines.]
教育部(2018)。中華民國教師專業素養指引—師資職前教育階段暨師資職前教育課
程基準。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL002163
[Ministry of Education. (2018). Guidelines for teachers’ professional competence in the Republic
of China– Pre-service teacher education stages and curriculum benchmarks. https://edu.
law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL002163.]
教育部(2019)。我國師資培育數量第三階段規劃方案。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/Download.
ashx?u=C099358C81D4876C1E56C80575D06437EEACE9798D1BD12F320293CF67ED
43DC38C7C489F3BA17362944C52A5D14EEF8B463E1FEB94AF759A828029CD1B2C
365&n=E98924F16D81AF7041E4CBEB4FF2246010BB20D082802DA7EA56F50E7088
C9045D6EF92625DE1C88C2515FEB60A554FE75F71ED42A5B15DAEF8D3096BFFD3
39746BEAB6D430BE33810A71619B3CD7FAF06F33FE532DE12AC
[Ministry of Education. (2019). The third phase of the program for the number of teachers
education in Taiwan. https://ws.moe.edu.tw/Download.ashx?u=C099358C81D4876C1E56
C80575D06437EEACE9798D1BD12F320293CF67ED43DC38C7C489F3BA17362944C
52A5D14EEF8B463E1FEB94AF759A828029CD1B2C365&n=E98924F16D81AF7041E
4CBEB4FF2246010BB20D082802DA7EA56F50E7088C9045D6EF92625DE1C88C2515
FEB60A554FE75F71ED42A5B15DAEF8D3096BFFD339746BEAB6D430BE33810A71
619B3CD7FAF06F33FE532DE12AC]
教育部(2022)。中華民國師資培育統計年報(110年版)。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/
Upload/8/relfile/7805/87052/6fbc92df-34ff-4a48-b877-1ec7240c9cf3.pdf
[Ministry of Education. (2022). The Republic of China yearbook of teacher education statistics
(2022). https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/8/relfile/7805/87052/6fbc92df-34ff-4a48-b877-
1ec7240c9cf3.pdf]
教育部(2023)。補助師資培育之大學辦理精進師資素質及特色發展計畫(113-116年
度)。師資培育暨藝術教育司。
[Ministry of Education. (2023). Subsidy program for teacher education universities improve
teaching quality and feature development (2013-2016). Department of Teacher and Art
Education.]
郭淑芳(2012)。我國師資培育制度回顧與展望。教育行政與評鑑學刊,13,91-114。
[Kuo, S.-F. (2012). Retrospect and prospect of teacher education system in Taiwan. Journal of
Educational Administration and Evaluation, 13, 91-114.]
湯家偉、王俐淳(2021)。《教師專業素養指引與師資職前教育課程基準》實施之影
響、挑戰與因應:中等師資培育機構之觀點。當代教育研究季刊,29(2), 61-
94。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202106_29(2).0003
[Tang, C.-W., & Wang, L.-C. (2021). The influence, challenges and coping strategies of the
“standard for pre-service teacher education curriculum” from the perspective of secondary
school teacher education institutions. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly,
29(2), 61-94. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202106_29(2).0003]
黃嘉莉(2006)。1990年代後臺灣教師證照制度發展之分析。教育研究與發展期刊,2
(1),63-92。
[Huang, J.-L. (2006). An historical analysis of teacher certification in Taiwan since 1990s.
Journal of Educational Research and Development, 2(1), 63-92.]
黃嘉莉(2008)。臺灣政治解嚴以來中小學師資培育的變革。載於蘇永明、方永泉(主
編),解嚴以來臺灣教育改革的省思(頁241-272)。學富。
[Huang, J.-L. (2008). Changes in teacher education in primary and secondary schools since the
lifting of martial law in Taiwan. In Y.-M. Shu & Y.-C. Fang (Eds.), Reflections on Taiwan’s
education reform since the lifting of martial law (pp. 241-272). Pro-ED.]
黃嘉莉(2009)。加州初任教師支持與評量系統之研究。教育研究與發展期刊,5
(1),130-163。
[Huang, J.-L. (2009). A study on California’s beginning teacher support and assessment. Journal
of Educational Research and Development, 5(1), 130-163.]
黃嘉莉(2013)。標準本位師資培育理念與實踐。國立臺灣師範大學出版中心。
[Huang, J.-L. (2013). The concept and practice of standard-based teacher education. National
Taiwan Normal University Publishing Center.]
楊思偉(2015)。20年來臺灣師資培育政策之回顧與檢討。載於吳清基、黃嘉莉(主
編),師資培育-20年的回顧與前瞻(頁1-31)。中華民國師範教育學會。
[Yang, S.-W. (2015). A review of Taiwan’s teacher education policy over the past 20 years. In
C.-J. Wu & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Teacher Education Act: Review and prospect over the past
20 (pp. 1-31). Chinese Teacher Education Society.]
楊思偉、陳盛賢、林政逸(2011)。我國師資培育政策變遷之研究—以師範校院為
主。載於中國教育學會(主編),百年教育的回顧—傳承與創新(頁97-118)。
學富。
[Yang, S.-W., Chen, S.-H., & Lin, C.-I. (2011). Research on changes in Taiwan teacher
education– Focusing on normal colleges. In China Education Society (Ed.), A century of
education review-inheritance and innovation (pp. 97-118). Pro-ED.]
楊深坑(2000)。新世紀師資培育之前瞻。載於中國教育學會(主編),跨世紀教育的
回顧與前瞻(頁21-46)。揚智。
[Yang, S.-K. (2000). Forward-looking teacher education in the new century. In China Education
Society (Ed.), Review and prospects of the education development for next century (pp. 21-
46). Yang-Chih Books.]
楊深坑(2006)。教育改革研究方法論的回顧與前瞻。教育研究集刊,52(4),141-
171。https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200612_(52-4).0005
[Yang, S.-K. (2006). Metahistorical analysis of methodologies in education reform research.
Bulletin of Educational Research, 52(4), 141-171. https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200612_
(52-4).0005]
熊瑞梅、紀金山(2001)。「師資培育法」形成的政策範疇影響力機制。台灣社會學,
4,199-246。
[Hsung, R.-M., & Chi, C.-S. (2001). The Influence mechanisms in the policy domain of the
Teacher Education Act. Taiwanese Sociology, 4, 199-246.]
歐用生(1998)。開放與卓越—台灣師資培育的改革與發展。載於沈慶揚、陳慶瑞、
蔡清華、顏素霞(主編),師資培育與教育研究(頁29-56)。復文圖書。
[Ou, Y.-S. (1998). Openness and excellence - Reform and development of teacher education in
Taiwan. In C.-Y. Shen, C.-R. Chen, C.-H. Tsai, & S.-H. Yen (Eds.), Teacher education and
educational research (pp. 29-56). Fu Wen Books.]
潘慧玲、洪秋瑋(2020)。標準本位政策脈絡下師資培育改革成效之評估:應用「行動
模式/改變模式圖式」分析師資培育學程。教育科學研究期刊,65(2),73-104。
https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0003
[Pan, H.-L., & Hung, C.-W. (2020). Effects of teacher education reform in the standard-based
policy context: Analysis of a teacher education program by applying the action model/
change model schema. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 65(2), 73-104. https://
doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0003]
謝卓君(2015)。臺灣多元化師資培育之法規發展、演變與檢討(1994-2014年)。載於
吳清基、黃嘉莉(主編),師資培育:20年的回顧與前瞻(頁67-102)。中華民國
師範教育學會。
[Hsieh, C.-C. (2015). Development, evolution and review of regulations on diversified teacher
education in Taiwan (1994-2014). In C.-J. Wu & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Teacher Education
Act: Review and prospect over the past 20 (pp. 67-102). Chinese Teacher Education
Society.]
蘇永明(2014)。解構在教育研究中的運用。載於林逢祺、洪仁進(主編),教育哲
學:方法篇(頁225-246)。學富。
[Su, Y.-M. (2014). The application of deconstruction in educational research. In F.-C. Lin & R.-J.
Hong (Eds.), Philosophy of education: Methods (pp. 225-246). Pro-ED.]
鐘程(2022)。幻象與否認:OECD《回到教育的未來》的價值取向研究—基于非工具
性分析路徑。比較教育學報,2,47-59。
[Zhong, C. (2022). Fantasy and disavowal: Research on value Orientation of OECD report “Back
to the future of education”– Based on non-instrumental analysis approach. Journal of
Comparative Education, 2, 47-59.]
Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories, and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the
Cultural Politics of Education, 3(2), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630930130203
Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the
question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability,
21(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9
Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy.
Routledge.
Biesta, G. (2017). The rediscovery of teaching. Routledge.
Biesta, G. (2022). World-centred education: A view for the present. Routledge.
Carusi, F. T. (2017). Why bother teaching? Despairing the ethical through teaching that does
not follow. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(6), 633-645. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11217-017-9569-0
Carusi, F. T., Rawlins, P., & Ashton, K. (2018). The ontological politics of evidence and policy
enablement. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 343-360.
Carusi, F. T. (2021). The ontological rhetorics of education policy: A non-instrumental theory.
Journal of Education Policy, 36(2), 232-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.
1665713
Dailey, A., Farmer, D., Giles, E., & Woodburn, R. (2020). Individual and societies for the IB
MYP4 & 5 (MYP by Concept 4 & 5). Hodder Education.
James, D. (2020). Is lifelong learning still useful? Disappointments and prospects for
rediscovery. Journal of Education and Work, 33(7-8), 522-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/
13639080.2020.1852509
Molla, T., & Nolan, A. (2020). Teacher agency and professional practice. Teachers and Teaching,
26(1), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1740196
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). The definition and selection
of key competencies: Executive summary. http