第七十一輯．第二期「108課綱回顧與前瞻」專刊－上（Open Access） - 2025-06-30

（一般論文）【學術評論】西方教育目的相關文獻之論評對華人世界的啟示：英美分析傳統、興旺（flourishing）與德國Bildung之相逢

（General Paper）【Academic Critical Review】Implications of a Literature Review on Western Educational Aims in the Context of the Chinese World: The Encounter of Anglo-American Analytic Tradition, Flourishing and the German Bildung

作　者：
簡成熙 / Cheng-Hsi Chien
關鍵字：
自主、幸福、教育目的、教育隱喻、興旺 / autonomy, well-being, aims of education, educational metaphor, flourishing
  • 摘要
  • 英文摘要
  • 參考文獻
  • 全文下載
（1）研究目的：教育目的本應主導教育政策方向，但晚近社會變遷快速、科技提升、知識經濟當道，也完全主導了各國教育的發展。許多人認為教育目的或理想的討論，曲高和寡，不合時宜。英美世界分析的教育哲學更曾經批評傳統教育哲學對於教育目的之討論過於空泛。本論評希望能檢視西方世界（英語及德語世界）對教育目的之討論，不僅為臺灣教育目的之研究提供反思，也期待能強化論評文體的書寫，鼓勵同道能更精研西方學理、議題，時時回饋臺灣學術界。（2）主要理論或概念架構：本評論先從1960年代英美分析傳統出發，評論其得失。從其概念分析的優點進一步精進傳統教育目的文獻。重新賦予傳統教育哲學新意，強化教育目的的知識論證，並凸顯教育目的之程序原則。分析傳統當年已對「快樂」（happiness）進行分析，到近年多位分析學者從「幸福」（well-being）、「興旺」（flourishing）的討論，成為新的重點，也吸引女性主義或心理學者探究，正方興未艾。此外，分析傳統當年忽略歐陸教育思想的精華。2000年後有了改變，如德國的Bildung（陶冶、教化、修養）重新在英語系世界受到重視，也吸引西方世界各國學者共同加以探究。前述探究成果，筆者均一一加以評論。（3）研究設計／方法／對象：本文運用文獻探討的方法加以評述。檢視英美分析的教育哲學前後代表性的教育目的文集、重要學者著作、西方教育哲學手冊等對教育目的之討論，加以歸納評論。論文計分五節。第一節緒論，第二節論述英美分析傳統論及教育目的之得失。第三節探討傳統教育哲學文獻的新意。第四節則是後分析哲學時代對教育的反思。第五節是結論。（4）研究發現或結論：筆者企圖說明分析的教育哲學不僅強化了爾後教育目的之討論，也更連結了達成目的之手段，並能重新凸顯傳統教育哲學論述的重點。分析學者原先批評的對象，無論是歐陸哲學教育目的用語之曖昧性，或是教育語言的情緒、歧義、非認知表意，從後現代的觀點看來，都能為教育帶來多元的想像。各種教育隱喻，能帶來新的驚奇，應該用多元的方法，重新加以正視。分析傳統本已重視程序原則，晚近政治哲學對於教育資源重新分配的政治考量，目的—手段之間已發展出更細緻的論述。後分析時代，西方國家之間與非西方國家也有著更多元的融合，都對教育目的帶來新的衝擊。在地球村之下，均應發揮維繫、豐富、重構各區域的教育文化新意。教育目的的多元討論，也應該更具體回應個人所處生活世界面臨的生態、環保、族群、宗教等的實際衝突。（5）理論或實務創見／貢獻／建議：本文檢視西方世界教育哲學半世紀以來探討教育目的的重要文獻，加以深度評論。研究發現直接有助於臺灣教育方向的反思，也將有助於學者進一步加以細部研究。本研究也能開拓評論文體，能鼓勵學者隨時論評西方重大教育學術成果，強化臺灣教育的研究視野。
（1）Purpose: The purpose of this review is to examine the discussion on the aims of education in the Western world (specifically in English- and German-speaking contexts), not only to provide reflection on the study of education purposes in Taiwan, but also to strengthen the academic writing of the review style, encourage colleagues to study Western theories and issues more closely, and contribute to the development of the Taiwan academic community.（2）Main Theories or Conceptual Frameworks: This review begins with the examination of the Anglo-American analytical tradition of the 1960s and evaluates its strengths and limitations. Drawing on the advantages of conceptual analysis, the study revisits classical literature on the traditional aims of education. The author also explores the evoluation of themes within the analytic tradition from happiness in the past to wellbeing and flourishing and the German concept of Bildung within the English-speaking world in recent years.（3）Research Design/Methods/Participants: The review adopts the method of literature investigation and is organized into five sections. This review summarizes the discussion of educational purpose in the representative collections, the works of important scholars, and the handbooks of western educational philosophy before and after Anglo-American analytic tradition. The first section provides an introduction. The second section analyzes the advantages and deficits of Anglo-American analytic tradition. The third section discusses the new meanings of literature of traditional philosophy of education. The fourth section presents the reflection on educational aims in the post-analytic philosophy era. The fifth section is the conclusion.（4）Research Findings or Conclusions: The original criticisms from analytic tradition, whether targeting the vagueness of language in European philosophy or the emotional, ambiguous and non-cognitive expression of educational language, can bring multiple imagination to education from a postmodern point of view. In the post-analysis era, both Western countries and non-Western countries have experienced more diverse forms of philosophical integration, which brings new impacts on the discussions of education ideals.（5）Theoretical or Practical Insights/Contributions/Recommendations: This review directly contributes to the reflection on the direction of education in Taiwan, and serves as a foundation for further studies. It also aims to promote a writing style of research review, encourage scholars to comment on major Western educational achievements, and strengthen the research horizons of Taiwan education.
丁証霖、瞿葆奎（選編）（1989）。教育目的。人民教育。
[Ting, C.-L., & Chü, P.-K. (Eds.). (1989). Aims of education. People’s Education Press.]
于偉（2017）「率性教育」建構與探索。教育研究，38（5），23-32。
[Yu, W. (2017). “Free-spirited education.”: Conceptual construction and practical exploration.
　　Educational Research, 38(5), 23-32.]
王文俊（1983）。人文主義與教育。五南。
[Wang, W.-C. (1983). Humanism and education. Wu-Nan Book.]
王俊斌（2010）。論M. Nussbaum「能力取向」的正義觀與教育發展。教育研究集刊，56
　　（2），41-69。
[Wang, C.-P. (2010). On M. Nussbaum’s capability approach to justice and its application to
　　education. Bulletin of Educational Research, 56(2), 41-69.]
王俊斌（2016）。能動性、相對正義與教育的公共善：Amartya Sen的能力取向理論及其
　　批評。關渡通識學刊，12（2），1-21。
[Wang, C.-P. (2016). Agency, relative justice, and educational public goods-Amartya Sen’s
　　capability approach theory and its criticism. Kuandu General Education Journal, 12(2),
　　1-21.]
田培林（1976）。教育與文化（上冊）。五南。
[Tien, P.-L. (1976). Education and culture (Vol. 1). Wu-Nan Book.]
林本（1978）。現代的理想中學生—我國中學教育目標與功能之研究。臺灣開明書
　　店。
[Lin, P. (1978). The ideal modern secondary school student: A study on the aims and functions of
　　secondary education in Taiwan. Taiwan Kai Ming Bookstore.]
林逢祺、洪仁進（主編）（2013）。教育哲學：隱喻篇。學富。
[Lin, F.-C., & Hung, J.-C. (Eds.). (2013). Philosophy of education: The metaphorical approach.
　　Pro-Ed.]
崔麐（2024）。重探教育機會均等：西方政治哲學對臺灣的借鏡。載於簡成熙、林仁傑
　　（主編），倫理學與教育政策的反思（341-372）。學富。
[Tsui, L. (2024). Revisiting equality of educational opportunity: Lessons of western political
　　philosophy for Taiwan. In C.-H. Chien & R.-J. Lin (Eds.), Reflections on ethics and
　　education policy (pp. 341-372). Pro-Ed.]
扈中平（2004）。教育目的論。湖北教育。
[Hu, C.-P. (2004). On the aims of education. Hubei Education Press.]
陳伊琳（2023）。書評：評介《幸福繁盛作為教育目的：新亞里斯多德式的觀點》。教
　　育研究集刊，69（2），129-139。https://doi.org/10.53106/102887082023066902004
[Chen, Y.-L. (2023). Book review: Flourishing as the aim of education: A Neo-Aristotelian view.
　　Bulletin of Educational Research, 69(2), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.53106/102887082023
　　066902004]
陳迺臣（1990）。教育哲學。心理。
[Chen, N.-C. (1990). Philosophy of education. Psychological.]
梁福鎮（2016）。教育哲學：起源、內涵與問題的探究。五南。
[Liang, F. (2016). Philosophy of education: Origins, meanings, and key issues. Wu-Nan Book.]
歐陽教（1988）。觀念分析學派的教育思潮。載於中國教育學會（主編），現代教育思
　　潮（頁1-50）。師大書苑。
[Ouyang, O. J. (1988). The educational trend of the conceptual analysis in London school. In
　　China Education Society (Ed.), Trend of thought in modern education (pp. 1-50). Lucky
　　Bookstore.]
歐陽教（1990）。教育的概念、口號與隱喻。師大教育研究所集刊，32，29-48。
[Ouyang, O. J. (1990). Educational concepts, slogans, and metaphors. Bulletin of the Institute of
　　Education, Bulletin of Graduate Institute of Education Taiwan Normal University, 32, 29-
　　48.]
葉瀾（2015）。回歸突破—「生命‧實踐」教育學綱論。華東師範大學出版社。
[Ye, L. (2015). Return and breakthrough: A general theory of “life-practice” pedagogy. East
　　China Normal University Press.]
鄭重信（1975）。存在哲學與其教育思想。文景。
[Cheng, C.-H (1975). Existential philosophy and its educational thought. Wen-Ching.]
簡成熙（2004）。教育哲學—理念、專題與實務。高等教育。
[Chien, C.-H. (2004). Philosophy of education: Ideas, topics, and practices. Higher Education.]
簡成熙（2008）。Siegel與Burbules對理性教育目的之論辯及其對臺灣教育之啟示。當代
　　教育研究季刊，16（4），39-70。
[Chien, C.-H. (2008). The debate between Siegel and Burbules on rationality as an educational
　　aim and its implications for education in Taiwan. Contemporary Educational Research
　　Quarterly, 16(4), 39-70.]
簡成熙（2022）。論G. J. J. Biesta對學習化的批評與教學的期許：兼論對師資培育的啟
　　示。教育研究集刊，68（2），81-116。https://doi.org/10.53106/102887082022066802
　　003
[Chien, C.-H. (2022). On G. J. J. Biesta’s criticism of learnification and expectations for teaching
　　and some implications to teacher education. Bulletin of Educational Research, 68(2), 81-
　　116. https://doi.org/10.53106/102887082022066802003]
簡成熙（2023a）。英美教育哲學—分析傳統。五南。
[Chien, C.-H. (2023a). Educational aims in Britain and America: Analytic tradition. Wu-Nan
　　Book.]
簡成熙（2023b）。教育還應該繼續重視學習的表現產出嗎？ Biesta的證據本位教育、績
　　效責任與PISA的批判。當代教育研究季刊，31（2），1-39。https://doi.org/10.6151/
　　CERQ.202306_31(2).0001
[Chien, C.-H. (2023b). Should education continue to focus on performativity and output of
　　learning? Biesta’s critiques of evidence-based education, accountability and PISA.
　　Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 31(2), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.6151/
　　CERQ.202306_31(2).0001]
簡成熙（2024）。兩種本真理念對自主性作為教育目的之反思。教育研究集刊，70
　　（1），123-161。https://doi.org/10.53106/102887082022066802003
[Chien, C.-H. (2024). Reflections on autonomy as the aim of education through two streams of
　　the idea of authenticity. Bulletin of Educational Research, 70(1), 123-161. https://doi.org/
　　10.53106/102887082022066802003]
簡成熙（2025）。Bildung與杜威「教育即生長」理念的互通。全球教育展望，54（8），
　　72-91。
[Chien, C.-H. (2025). The convergence of Bildung and Dewey’s “Education as growth”. Global
　　Education, 54(8), 72-91.]
劉良華（2014）。論興發教學。上海教育科研，3，27-31。
[Liu, L.-H. (2014). On inspiring instruction. Shanghai Scientific Research of Education, 3, 27-
　　31.]
劉良華（2022）。立足學生主體的興發教學改革。教育集刊，2，5-10。https://doi.
　　org/10.16215/j.cnki.cn44-1371/g4.2022.02.001
[Liu, L.-H. (2022). Reforming inspiring instruction based on student subjectivity. Journal
　　of Educational Development, 2, 5-10. https://doi.org/10.16215/j.cnki.cn44-1371/
　　g4.2022.02.001]
劉源俊（2020）。正本清源說素養。教育研究評論月刊，9（1），13-19。
[Liu, Y.-C. (2020). Clarifying the competences. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 9(1), 13-
　　19.]
劉鐵芳（2011）。教育意向性的喚起與「興」作為教育的技藝：一種教育現象學的探
　　究。高等教育研究，32（10），26-37。
[Liu, T.-F. (2011). Arousal of educational intentionality and xing as a skill of education: An
　　exploration on phenomenology of education. Journal of Higher Education, 32(10), 26-37.]
劉鐵芳（2019）。起興、啟發與對話：走向生命整全的教學藝術。全球教育展望，9，
　　24-38。
[Liu, T.-F. (2019). Initiation, inspiration and dialogue: Teaching techniques towards the integrity
　　of life. Global Education, 9, 24-38.]
Adler, J. E. (2003). Know, truth and learning. In R. Curren (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy
　　of education (pp. 285-304). Blackwell.
Adler, J. E. (2009). Why fallibility has not mattered and how it could. In H. Siegel (Ed.), The
　　Oxford handbook of philosophy of education (pp. 83-103). Oxford University Press.
　　Bagattini, A., & Macleod, C. (Eds.). (2015). The nature of children’s wellbeing: Theory and
　　practice. Springer.
Barrow, R. (1975). Plato, utilitarianism and education. Routledge.
Barrow, R. (1976). Commonsense and the curriculum. Allen & Unwin.
Barrow, R. (1978). Radical education: A critique of free schooling and deschooling. Martin
　　Roberston.
Barrow, R. (2012). Happiness. Routledge.
Beck, C. M. (1991). North American, British and Australian philosophy of education from 1941-
　　1991. Educational Theory, 41(3), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1991.00311.x
Berman, L. M., Hultgran, F. H., Lee D., Rivkin, M. S., Roderick, J. A, & Auki, T. (1991). Toward
　　curriculum for being: Voices of educator. State University of New York Press.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for human future. Paradigm.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics and
　　democracy. Routledge.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2016). The beautiful risk of education. Routledge.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2017). The discovery of teaching. Routledge.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2022). World-centred education: A view for the present. Routledge.
Bonnett, M. (1978). Authenticity and education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 12(1), 51-
　　66.
Bonnett, M., & Cuypers, S. (2003). Autonomy and authenticity in education. In N. Blake,
　　P. Smeyers, R. Smith, & P. Standish (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of
　　education (pp. 326-340). Blackwell.
Brameld, T. (1950). Patterns of educational philosophy. World Book.
Brameld, T. (1965). Education for the emerging age: Newer ends and stronger means. Harper &
　　Row.
Brighouse, H. (2006). On education. Routledge.
Brighouse, H. (2009). Moral and political aims of education. In H. Siegel (Ed.), The Oxford
　　handbook of philosophy of education (pp. 35-51). Oxford University Press.
Brubacher, J. S. (1962). Modern philosophies and education. McGraw-Hill.
Broudy, H. S. (1961). Building a philosophy of education. Prentice-Hall.
Brown, L. M. (Ed.). (1970). Aim of education. Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Brown, S. C. (Ed.). (1975). Philosophers discuss education. The Macmillan Press.
Cooper, D. E. (1983). Authenticity and learning. RKP.
Curren, R. (2023). Enabling everyone to live well. In R. Curren (Ed.), Handbook of philosophy
　　of education (42-55). Blackwell.
Cuypers, S. E. (2017). Self-identity and personal autonomy: An analytic anthropology.
　　Routledge.
Dearden, R. F. (1972). Happiness and education. In R. F. Dearden, P. H. Hirst, & R. S Peters
　　(Eds.), Education and the development of reason (pp. 95-112). Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Dearden, R. F., Hirst, P. H., & Peters, R. S. (Eds.). (1972). Education and the development of
　　reason. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
de Ruyter, D. J. (2004). Pottering in the garden? On human flourishing and education.
　　British Journal of Educational Studies, 52(4), 377-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-
　　8527.2004.00274.x
de Ruyter, D. J. (2007). Ideas, education, and happy flourishing. Educational Theory, 57(1), 23-
　　35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00242.x
de Ruyter, D. J. (2012). On optimal development and becoming an optimiser. Journal of
　　Philosophy of Education, 46(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00833.x
de Ruyter, D. J. (2015). Well-being in education. In J. Suissa, C. Winstanley, & R. Marples (Eds.),
　　Education, philosophy and well-being: New perspectives on the work of John White (pp.
　　84-98). Routledge.
de Ruyter, D. J. (2018). Well-Being and the upbringing and education of children. In P. Smeyers
　　(Ed.), International handbook of philosophy of education (Part 2, pp. 937-950). Springer.
de Ruyter, D. J., & Wolbert, L (2020). Human flourishing as an aim of education. In Oxford
　　research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/
　　acrefore/9780190264093.031.1418
Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education. The Free Press.
Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (Eds.). (2017). The nature of children’s wellbeing: Theory
　　and practice. Springer.
Frankena, W. (1965). Three historical philosophies of education. Scott, Foresman and Company.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2024). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.).
　　Bloomsbury Academic. (Original work published 1975)
Gilroy, P. (1982). The revolution in English philosophy and philosophy of education.
　　Educational Analysis, 4(1), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2012.752985
Gilroy, P. (1999). The aim of education and the philosophy of education. In R. Marples (Ed.),
　　The aims of education (pp. 23-34). Routledge.
Gur-Ze’ev, I. (2003). Bildung and critical theory in the face of postmodern. In L. Løvlie, K. P.
　　Mortensen, & S. E. Nordenbo (Eds.), Educating humanity: Bildung in postmodernity (pp.
　　75-92). Blackwell.
Hattie, J., & Larsen, S. N. (2020). The purposes of education. Routledge.
Hollins, T. H. B. (Ed.). (1964). Aims in education: The philosophic approach. Manchester
　　University Press.
Horlacher, R. (2016). The educated subject and the German concept of Bildung: A comparative
　　cultural history. Routledge.
Jackson, L. (2023). Purposes of education. In W. C. Thompson (Ed.), Philosophical foundations
　　of education (pp. 31-53). BloomsburyAcademic.
Jessop, S. (2012). Education for citizenship and “ethical life”: An exploration of the Hegelian
　　concepts of Bildung and sittlichkeit. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(2), 287-302.
　　https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2012.00849.x
Kaminsky, J. S. (1993). A new history of educational philosophy. Greenwood Press.
Kim, J.-H. (2013). Teacher action research as Bildung: An application of Gadamer’s
　　philosophical hermeneutics to teacher professional development. Journal of Curriculum
　　Studies, 45(3), 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.702224
Komisar, B. P., & Macmillan, C. J. B. (Eds.). (1967). Psychological concepts in education. Rand
　　McNally & Company.
Kristjánsson, K. (2020). Flourishing as the aim of education: A neo-Aristotelian view.
　　Routledge.
Løvlie, L., Mortensen, K. P., & Nordenbo, S. E. (Eds.). (2003). Educating humanity: Bildung in
　　postmodernity. Blackwell.
Løvlie, L., & Standish, P. (2003). Introduction: Bildung and the idea of a liberal education. In
　　L. Løvlie, K. P. Mortensen, & S. E. Nordenbo (Eds.), Educating humanity: Bildung in
　　postmodernity (pp. 1-24). Blackwell.
Lucas, C. (Ed). (1976). Challenge and choice in contemporary: Six major ideological
　　perspectives. Macmillan.
Marples, R. (Ed.). (1999). The aims of education. Routledge.
Martin, J. R. (1970). Explaining, understanding, and teaching. McGraw-Hill.
Martin, J. R. (1994). Changing the educational landscape: Philosophy, women, and curriculum.
　　Routledge.
Martin, J. R. (1995). Education for domestic tranquility. In W. Kohli (Ed.), Critical conversations
　　in philosophy of education (pp. 45-55). Routledge.
Martin, J. R. (2002). Cultural miseducation: In search of a democratic solution. Teachers
　　College Press, Columbia University.
Martin, J. R. (2011). Educational reconfigured: Culture, encounter, and change. Routledge.
Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and education. Cambridge University Press.
　　Noddings, N. (Ed.). (2005). Educating citizens for global awareness. Teachers College Press,
　　Columbia University.
Noddings, N. (2006). Critical lesson: What our school should teach? Cambridge University
　　Press.
Nordenbo, S. E. (2003). Bildung and the thinking of Bildung. In L. Løvlie, K. P. Mortensen, & S.
　　E. Nordenbo (Eds.), Educating humanity: Bildung in postmodernity (pp. 25-36). Blackwell.
O’Brien, C. (2016). Education for sustainable happiness and wellbeing. Routledge.
O’Connor, D. J. (1957). An introduction to the philosophy of education. RKP.
O’Hear, A. (1981). Education, society and human nature. Routledge.
Peters, R. S. (1959). Authority, responsibility and education. Allen and Unwin.
Peters, R. S. (1966). Ethics and Education. George Allen & Unwin.
Peters, R. S. (1977). Education and the education of teachers. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Peters, R. S. (1981). Essays on educator. George Allen & Unwin.
Phenix, P. H. (1958). Philosophy of education. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Pratte, R. (1971). Contemporary theories of education. Intext Educational.
Pratte, R. (1992). Philosophy of education: Two tradition. Charles C. Thomas.
Price, K. (1962). Education and philosophical thought. Allyn and Bacon.
Pring, R. A. (1995). Closing the gap: Liberal education and vocational preparation. Hodder &
　　Stoughton.
Reichenbach, R. (2003). Beyond sovereignty: The twofold subversion of Bildung. Educational
　　Philosophy and Theory, 35(2), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-5812.00019
Robertson, E. (2009). The epistemic aims of education. In H. Siegel (Ed.), The Oxford handbook
　　of philosophy of education (pp. 11-34). Oxford University Press.
Rorty, R. (2018). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton University Press. (Original
work published 1979)
Scheffler, I. (1960). The language of education. Charles C. Thomas.
Scheffler, I. (1973). Reason and teaching. The Bobbs-Merrill.
Schinkel, A. (2021). Wonder and education: On the educational importance of contemplative
　　wonder. Bloomsbury Academic.
Schneider, K. (2012). The subject-object transformation and “Bildung.” Educational Philosophy
　　and Theory, 44(3), 302-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00696.x
Seymour, M. (Ed). (2004). Educating for humanity: Rethinking the purpose of education.
　　Paradigm.
Shermis, S. S. (1967). Philosophical foundations of education. D. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education. Routledge.
Siegel, H. (2003). Cultivating reason. In R. Curren (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of
　　education (pp. 305-319). Blackwell.
Siegel, H. (2017). Education’s epistemology: Rationality, diversity, and critical thinking. Oxford
　　University Press.
Silijander, P., Kivelä, A., & Sutinen, A. (Eds.). (2012). Theories of Bildung and growth:
　　Connections and controversies between continental educational thinking and American
　　pragmatism. Sense.
Smeyers, P. (Ed.). (2018). International Handbook of philosophy of education (Part 1). Springer.
Smeyers, P., Smith, R., & Standish, P. (2007). The therapy of education: Philosophy, happiness
　　and personal growth. Palgrave Macmillan.
Standish, P. (2003). The nature and purposes of education. In R. Curren (Ed.), A companion to
　　the philosophy of education (pp. 221-231). Blackwell Publishing.
Standish, P. (2018). Therapy. In P. Smeyers (Ed.), International handbook of philosophy of
　　education (Part 2, pp. 1235-1246). Springer.
Stojanov, K. (2012). The concept of Bildung and its moral implications. In K. Schneider (Ed.),
　　Becoming oneself: Dimensions of Bildung and the facilitation of personality development
　　(pp. 75-88). Springer VS.
Stojanov, K. (2018). Education, self-consciousness and social action: Bildung as a Neo-
　　Hegelian concept. Routledge.
Thompson, C. (2005). The non-transparency of the self and the ethical value of Bildung.
　　Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(3), 519-533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-
　　9752.2005.00451.x
Thompson, C. (2006). Adorno and the borders of experience: The significance of the
　　nonidentical for a “different” theory of Bildung. Educational Theory, 56(1), 69-87. https://
　　doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00004.x
Tröhler, D. (2011). Language of education: Protestant leagacies, national identities, and global
　　aspirations. Routledge.
Ulich, R. (1950). History of educational thought. American Book. (Original work published
　　1945)
Ulich, R. (1961). Philosophy of education. American Book.
Ulich, R. (1965). Crisis and hope in American education. Atherton Press.
Vinterbo-Hohr, A., & Hohr, H. (2006). The neo-humanistic concept of Bildung going astray:
　　Comments to F. Schiller’s thoughts on education. Educational Philosophy and Theory,
　　38(2), 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00189.x
Wahlström, N. (2010). Do we need to talk each other? How the concept of experience can
　　contribute to an understanding of Bildung and democracy. Educational Philosophy and
　　Theory, 42(2), 293-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00441.x
White, J. (1982). The aims of education restated. RKP.
White, J. (1990). Education and the good life. Kogan Page.
White, J. (1997). Education and the end of work: A new philosophy of work and learning.
　　Cassell.
White, J. (2003). Five critical stands towards liberal philosophy of education in Britain. Journal
　　of Philosophy of Education, 37(1), 147-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.3701010
White, J. (2005). The curriculum and the child: The selected works of John White. Routledge.
White, J. (2007). Wellbeing and education: Issues of culture and authority. Journal of Philosophy
　　of Education, 41(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2007.00540.x
White, J. (2011). Exploring well-being in schools. Routledge.
Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Basil
　　Blackwell.
Wringe, C. (1988). Understanding educational aims. Unwin Hyman.
Wringe, C. (1997). In defense of rational autonomy as an educational goal. In D. Bridges (Ed.),
　　Education, autonomy and democratic citizenship (pp. 115-126). Routledge.
 

 

全文下載