大專院校教師「違反聘約情節重大」案例暨相關法律問題探討
Research on Case and Leagal Issure Involved in Teacher Violating Employment Contract seriously by Colleges and University
- 關鍵字：
- 違反聘約情節重大、不續聘、限期升等 / violating employment contract seriously, nonrenewal, deadline promotion
第六十二輯．第四期 - 2016-12-31
議題與趨勢：由教科書內容看臺灣教育社會學學科架構的發展 張建成
Issues and Trends:On the development of the disciplinary framework of sociology of education in Taiwan: An analysis of textbooks published from 1960s to 2010sJason Chien-chen Chang
大專院校教師「違反聘約情節重大」案例暨相關法律問題探討黃源銘
Research on Case and Leagal Issure Involved in Teacher Violating Employment Contract seriously by Colleges and UniversityYuan-Ming Huang
BBL取向體育教學對學生知識理解、問題解決能力與學習動機之影響陳昭宇,林靜萍
The Effects of Brain-Based Learning on Students’ Knowledge Structure, Problem-Solving Capability, and Learning Motivation in Physical Education TeachingChao-Yu Chen，Ching-Ping Lin
以TIMSS資料檢視2003至2011臺灣八年級學生數學成就城鄉差異李哲迪
Using TIMSS data to Investigate Rural-urban Differences of Taiwanese Eighth Graders’ Mathematics Achievement from 2003 to 2011Che-Di Lee
編輯的話卯靜儒
Words from the EditoralChin-Ju Mao
- 摘要
- 英文摘要
- 參考文獻
- 全文下載
晚近愈來愈多的司法裁判顯示,教師因違反聘約而遭學校停聘、解聘或不續 聘,其中包括未經核准在外兼課、兼職、未能限期升等、未通過教師評鑑,以及 未於規定年限取得博士學位⋯⋯等類型。《教師法》第14條第1項第14款規定: 「違反聘約情節重大」構成停聘、解聘及不續聘之法律效果,上述事實雖可能 「違反聘約」,但是否即屬「情節重大」不無疑問。
本文首先歸納整理「違反聘約情節重大」之裁判類型;其次,就違反聘約情
節重大得否由當事人於聘約中約定,以及違反聘約是否即屬情節重大等疑義,進
行學說與實務之探討;再者,主管機關對違反聘約情節重大之核准權,究應採高
密度之監督或低密度之審查一併進行檢討;最後,檢視司法裁判對於教師工作權
保障之價值取捨並提出本文考察之心得。
A growing number of judicial cases have revealed that the violation of employment contracts by teachers could lead to dismissal or nonrenewal of contracts, which could result from unapproved side jobs, unsuccessful faculty promotion, failed faculty evaluation, or the inability to obtain a doctoral degree within the deadline. Although in Chapter III of the Teachers’ Act, Article 14-1 stipulates that teachers seriously violating employment contracts could be suspended, dismissed, or non-renewed, it still remains debatable whether the abovementioned are to be regarded as “serious violation”.
To look into this issue, this paper first summarizes the adjudication of serious employment contract violation, and then explains the major actions constituting serious employment contract violation theoretically and practically. Further, the issue regarding whether the educational administrative authorities in validating the condition of “serious violation of employment contract” should be exercised by high-density super vision or by law-density screening is also reviewed. Based on the discussion, this paper then examines the value of judicial adjudication on university autonomy and protection of teachers’ right to work and finally proposes recommendations.
吳志光(2009)。教師聘約之終止與行政監督:以教師之身分變更為例。行政管制與行 政爭訟學術研討會論文集,18。
[Wu, C.-K. (2009). Termination and administrative supervision of teacher employment contract: A study of changes to the identity of teachers. Administrative Regulation and Judicial Remedies Conference Proceedings, 18.]
吳志光(2014)。教育主管機關對大學行政監督之界限。世新法學,8(1),1-38。
[Wu, C.-K. (2014). State supervision over university and university self-government. Shih Hsin Law Review, 8(1), 1-38.]
吳庚(2012)。行政法理論與實用(增訂12版)。臺北市:三民。
[Wu, K. (2012). Theory and application of administrative law (12th ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: San Min Book.]
李建良(2009)。公法實務導論。台灣法學雜誌,139,179-194。
[Lee, C.-L. (2009). Introduction to practices of public law. Taiwan Law Journal, 139, 179-194.]
李惠宗(2014)。教育行政法(二版)。臺北市:元照。
[Lee, H.-T. (2014). Administrative law of rducation (2nd ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Angle.]
周志宏(2012)。教育法與教育改革(II)。臺北市:高等教育。
[Chou, C.-H. (2012). Education act and education reformation (II). Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.]
周志宏(2014)。學術自由與高等教育法制(二)。臺北市:高等教育。
[Chou, C.-H. (2014). Academic freedom & higher educational law II. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.]
周佳宥(2014)。教育主管機關為適法性監督之審查義務/最高行政法院103判字431判決。台灣法學雜誌,261,179-184。
[Chou, C.-Y. (2014). Obligations of education authorities for legal supervision and review/Supreme Administrative Court Pan-Tzu No. 431. Taiwan Law Journal, 261, 179-184.]
林明鏘(2015)。教師資遣與行政救濟:兼評最高行政法院98年庭長法官聯席會議決議。台灣法學雜誌,269,101-108。
[Lin, M.-C. (2015). Teacher severance and administrative remedy: Resolution of the 2009 joint supreme administrative court division chief judge and judge Meeting. Taiwan Law Journal,269, 101-108.]
許育典(2007)。教育法。臺北市:五南。
[Hsu, Y.-D. (2007). Education Act. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.]
許育典(2014)。大學法制與高等教育。臺北市:元照。
[Hsu, Y.-D. (2014). University legal system. Taipei, Taiwan: Angle.]
陳淑芳(2010)。教師對學校變更與消滅聘約關係不符之救濟:評最高行政法院98年7月份庭長法官聯席會議決議。法令月刊,61(6),64-78。
[Chen, S.-F. (2010). Remedies for changes to and the termination of contract relationship between teachers and schools: Resolution of the 2009 July joint supreme Administrative Court division chief judge and judge meeting. The Law Monthly, 61(6), 64-78.]
程明修(2005)。行政法之行為與法律關係理論。臺北市:學林。
[Cheng, M.-H. (2005). Administrative law conduct and relation theory of law. Taipei, Taiwan:Sharing.]
程明修(2015)。教師法第十四條中教育部,公私立大學與教師間之法律關係(以教育部之「核准」為中心)。東吳公法裁判研究會第三十回,10-13。
[Cheng, M.-H. (2015). Legal relationship between public and private universities and teachers in accordance with article 14 of the Teacher Act: The approval of the Ministry of Education.The 30th Soochow University School of Law Seminar, 10-13.]
黃源銘(2015)。大學教師評鑑相關法律問題探討。中正法學集刊,49,40-41。
[Huang, Y.-M. (2015). Investigation of legal problems relating to university teacher evaluation.National Chung Chen University Law Journal, 49, 40-41.]
董保城(1997)。教育法與學術自由。臺北市:月旦。
[Dong, B.-C. (1997). Education law and academic freedom. Taipei, Taiwan: Yue dan.]
蕭文生(2015)。行政事件裁判研究與評析。臺北市:元照。
[Hsiao, W.-S. (2015). Research and analysis of judgements for administrative cases. Taipei,Taiwan: Angle.]
.png)
