本文係以方法論的反省為著眼,就Edmund Husserl的「現象學反思」(phenomenological reflection)與Kral-Otto Apel所主張的「意識型態批判」(ideological critics)做為對比的焦點。基於方法對立性的凸顯,本文企圖一方面試著聚焦於「現象學反思」與「意識型態批判」在知識論與方法學上比較;另一方面則為期待透過這樣的對照,進而探索其在教育研究方法論反思上所孕含的意義。
Based on methodological reflection foundation, the researcher compares the methodological standpoints between Edmund Husserl’s “phenomenological reflection” and Kral-Otto Apel’s “ideological critics” in this paper. The main purposes of this article are as follows: to explore the significance of methodological comparison and inquire its educational research implications.