第七十一輯．第三期「108課綱回顧與前瞻」專刊－下（Open Access） - 2025-09-30

（專刊論文）【研究論文】你的自主vs.我的專業：公民與社會教師對探究教學之探究

（Special Issue Paper）【Research Paper】Your Self-directed Learning vs. My Professional Practice: Civics and Society Teachers’ Inquiry Into Inquiry Teaching

作　者：
陳素秋 / Suchiu Chen
關鍵字：
公民與社會、專業認同、探究指引、探究教學、學生中心 / civics and society, professional identity, inquiry guidance, inquiry-based teaching, student-centered
  • 摘要
  • 英文摘要
  • 參考文獻
  • 全文下載
（1）研究目的：108課綱新增探究與實作課，此課綱是歷史中首度出現的新課程，有賴教師自行研究發展課程內容，因此，成為教師教學之挑戰。本研究將教師發展、設計探究課程視為一種探究，故從探究歷程觀點分析教師之探究，同時透過分析學生的學習經驗來瞭解教師的探究教學成效。（2）主要理論或概念架構：依據108公民與社會探究與實作課綱之探究四要項架構，以及教師指引與探究教學成效之相關理論進行分析。（3）研究設計／方法／對象：本研究採用深度訪談法。邀請教授高中公民與社會科探究與實作之教師，分別於學期初課程規劃階段、學期中授課歷程以及學期末課程總結時三個階段，每位教師進行三次深度訪談。於此同時，為瞭解學生對於教師規劃出的探究教學的經驗，亦於學期末時邀請受訪教師之授課班級學生進行訪談。（4）研究發現或結論：本研究發現，儘管教師都依據課綱指示的探究四大要項進行教學，但教師依據專業判斷以及學生學習特色，分別針對探究歷程中不同探究要項進行教學創新。不同教師各自選擇不同探究要項進行教學創新，不僅意味著教師具有探究教學上自我培力的專業能力，同時也顯示社會領域探究教學可能的多元樣貌。在教學成效評估上，教師發現因為探究與實作課程並非升學考試科目，故學生普遍學習動機不高，且探究結果之品質落差大。然而，學生都明確指出自身獲得探究能力之成長，特別是資料蒐集與資料分析呈現這兩項能力。在教師探究指引與學生學習成效上，本文指出，明確指引對學生學習有效，但密集指引則成效不佳，甚至可能妨礙學生學習。本文主張，教師在探究教學的主要困頓，並非來自探究教學知能的缺乏，而是來自專業認同之焦慮。探究學習強調學生自主，因此教師應扮演專業指引者，這意味著教師在必修課程中所扮演的專業角色，在探究與實作課程裡並不適用。然而，所謂專業指引者的角色內涵並不明確，教師往往採用必修課程裡知識傳授者的專業角色內涵來審視自身的探究教學表現，以知識傳授者的專業指標來檢視專業指引者，而此落差引發教師專業認同上的焦慮，也導致學生自主與教師專業實踐形成一種原本不應存在的緊張困境。（5）理論或實務創見／貢獻／建議：探究學習旨在培養學生知識建構力，探究的每一要項所發展出的能力都有助於提升知識建構力。本文建議，未來師資培育及探究教學課綱可指引教師如何從過程取向觀點進行探究教學的學習評量，這將有助於教師在評估學生學習成效時，除探究成果外，也看見學生在探究歷程中探究能力的提升。未來的探究教學推動政策，在提供教師探究教學知能外，亦應致力於提供專業指引者角色內涵供教師參考，以化解教師在探究教學上的不安。
(1) Purpose: The 2019 Curriculum Guidelines in Taiwan introduced Inquiry and Practice as a new subject, a first in the history of curriculum guidelines. This new subject relies on teachers to independently research and develop course content, posing a significant challenge to their teaching practices. This article views teachers’ development and design of inquiry-based courses as a form of inquiry itself. Accordingly, it analyzed teachers’ inquiry process from the perspective of the inquiry cycle and examines students’ learning experiences to evaluate the effectiveness of teachers’ inquiry-based teaching. (2) Main Theories or Conceptual Frameworks: The analysis is based on the four key components of inquiry outlined in the 108 Civics and Society Inquiry and Practice curriculum guidelines, along with relevant theories related to teacher guidance and the effectiveness of inquiry-based teaching. (3) Research Design/Methods/Participants: This study employed a qualitative research design using in-depth interviews. High school teachers of the Civics and Society Inquiry and Practice course were invited to participate in three rounds of in-depth interviews: at the beginning of the semester during the curriculum planning phase, mid-semester during the teaching process, and at the end of the semester for a course wrap-up. Simultaneously, interviews were also conducted with students from the participating teachers’ classes at the end of the semester to understand their experiences with the inquiry-based teaching designed by these teachers. (4) Research Findings or Conclusions: This study found that besides following the four key components of inquiry as instructed by the curriculum guidelines, all participating teachers also incorporated pedagogical innovations at various stages of the inquiry process based on their professional judgment and their students’ learning characteristics. Such innovations not only signifies their professional capacity for self-empowerment in inquiry-based teaching but also reveals the diverse possibilities within inquiry-based teaching in the social studies domain. In terms of evaluating teaching effectiveness, teachers noted that students generally lacked motivation because the Inquiry and Practice course is not included in the high-stakes examinations for university admission, leading to wide disparities in the quality of their inquiry projects. At the same time, students reported consistent growth in developing inquiry skills, particularly in data collection, data analysis, and presentation. With respect to the relationship between teacher guidance and student learning outcomes, this study found that clear guidance is effective for student learning, but intensive guidance yields poor results and may even hinder student learning. This paper argues that the main challenge teachers face in inquiry-based teaching is not insufficient knowledge or skills related to inquiry pedagogy, but rather anxiety stemming from their professional identity. Since inquiry learning emphasizes student autonomy, it requires teachers to act as professional guides, which implies that the professional role teachers play in compulsory courses is not applicable in the Inquiry and Practice course. However, the specific role and responsibilities of a “professional guide” are not clearly defined. As a result, teachers tend to evaluate their performance in inquiry-based teaching using the professional standards of a knowledge transmitter, the role they typically play in compulsory courses. This mismatch between the expected role of a professional guide and the self-assessment based on the standards of a knowledge transmitter leads to anxiety in teachers’ professional identity. It also creates an unnecessary tension between student autonomy and teachers’ professional practice. (5) Theoretical or Practical Insights/Contributions/Recommendations: Inquiry-based learning seeks to cultivate students’ ability to construct knowledge, and the skills developed in each component of the inquiry process contribute to enhancing this ability. This paper recommends that future teacher education and curriculum guidelines for inquiry-based teaching should provide explicit guidance to teachers on process-oriented assessment of student learning. This will help teachers to evaluate student learning outcomes not only based on the final inquiry project but also by recognizing the development of inquiry skills throughout the inquiry process. Furthermore, future policies promoting inquiry-based teaching, in addition to providing teachers with knowledge and skills related to inquiry pedagogy, should also strive to offer a clear framework for the role of a “professional guide” for teachers’ reference. This will help reduce teachers’ anxiety and uncertainty in implementing inquiry-based teaching.
白佩宜、許瑛玿（2011）。探討不同探究式教學法對高一生科學探究能力與學習環境觀
　　感之影響。課程與教學，14（3），123-156。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201107.0124
[Pai, P.-Y., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2011). The impact of fifferent inquiry-based instructions on tenth
　　graders’ inquiry ability and perspectives about learning environment. Curriculum and
　　Instruction Quarterly, 14(3), 123-156. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201107.0124]
李建邦、段曉林（2012）。在職教師實施探究教學的教學轉變與調整策略。載於張世忠
　　（主編），數理學科教學知能（第三冊，頁70-81）。華藝數位、中原大學教育研究
　　所。https://doi.org/10.6614/pck.2012.3.70
[Li, J.-B., & Tuan, H.-L. (2012). The change of teaching practices and self-regulation strategies
　　for in-service teachers under inquiry instruction. In S.-J. Jang (Ed.), PCK in science and
　　mathematics (Vol. 3, pp. 70-81). Airiti & The Graduate Institute of Education at Chung
　　Yuan Christian University. https://doi.org/10.6614/pck.2012.3.70]
陳均伊（2010）。教師專業成長之個案研究：一位國中自然教師探究教學觀點的轉變。
　　教育科學研究期刊，55（2），233-264。https://doi.org/10.6278/tjme.20170914.002
[Chen, J.-Y. (2010). A case study of a teacher’s professional development: A junior high school
　　teacher’s views on inquiry teaching. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(2),
　　233-264. https://doi.org/10.6278/tjme.20170914.002]
陳素秋（2024）。提問？還是探究？檢視問句式課綱下的公民與社會教科書。教科書研
　　究，17（1），1-34。https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.202404_17(1).01
[Chen, S.-C. (2024). Questions or inquiries? A review on civics and society textbooks developed
　　on the basis of question-based course guidelines. Journal of Textbook Research, 17(1), 1-34.
　　https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.202404_17(1).01]
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。
[Ministry of Education. (2014). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: General
　　guidelines.]
教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校：社
　　會領域。
[Ministry of Education. (2018). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education for elementary
　　school, junior high and general senior high schools: The domain of social studies.]
教育部（2020，10月6日）。落實探究與實作課程 教育部國教署推動教師多元增能。
　　https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=03281F64F3931F
　　BF
[Ministry of Education. (2020, October 6). Implementing the inquiry and practice
　　curriculum: The K-12 Education Administration promotes teachers’ diverse professional
　　development. https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=
　　03281F64F3931FBF]
游小旻、張文華（2022）。不同學習領域教師對探究與探究教學的看法與教學實
　　務。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，15（1），91-127。https://doi.org/10.53106/
　　207136492022041501004
[Yu, H.-M., & Chang, W.-H. (2022). The views and practices of teachers in different
　　learning areas about inquiry and inquiry-based instruction. Journal of Teacher
　　Education and Professional Development, 15(1), 91-127. https://doi.org/10.53106/
　　207136492022041501004]
張茂桂、楊秀菁（2019）。十二年國教「社會領綱」的探究學習及「探究與實作」課程
　　的特色。國教課綱向前行電子報，22。https://newsletter.edu.tw/2019/04/10/%E5%8D
　　%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9% B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E3%80%8C%E7%A4%
　　BE%E6%9C%83%E 9%A0%98%E7%B6%B1%E3%80%8D%E7%9A%84%E6%8E%A
　　2%E7%A9 %B6%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92%E5%8F%8A%E3%80%8C%E6%8E%A2
　　%E7%A9%B6%E8%88%87%E5%AF%A6-2/
[Chang, M.-K., & Yang, H.-C. (2019). Inquiry-based learning and the features of the “inquiry
　　and practice” curriculum in the 12-year social studies curriculum guidelines. Newsletter
　　for Curriculum Guidelines, 22. https://newsletter.edu.tw/2019/04/10/%E5%8D%81%E
　　4%BA%8C%E5%B9% B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E3%80%8C%E7%A4%BE%
　　E6%9C%83%E 9%A0%98%E7%B6%B1%E3%80%8D%E7%9A%84%E6%8E%A2%
　　E7%A9 %B6%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92%E5%8F%8A%E3%80%8C%E6%8E%A2
　　%E7%A9%B6%E8%88%87%E5%AF%A6-2/]
楊秀菁、謝名娟（2019）。十二年國教課綱社會領域「探究與實作」課程之轉化與落實
　　（NAER-2019-029-C-1-1-A6-04）。國家教育研究院。
[Yang, H.-C., & Hsieh, M.-C. (2019). Transform and practice of the new curricula in 12-Basic
　　education: An example of social studies “inquiry and practice” course (NAER-2019-029-
　　C-1-1-A6-04). National Academy for Educational Research.]
章凱閎（2020，10月5日）。新課綱現場／探究與實作　空白課程推給代理師。聯合電子
　　報。https://paper.udn.com/udnpaper/PID0001/357759/web/#6L-17915300L
[Chang, K.-H. (2020, October 5). New curriculum implementation/on-site report: Inquiry and
　　practice blank courses shifted to substitute teachers. United Daily News E-paper. https://
　　paper.udn.com/udnpaper/PID0001/357759/web/#6L-17915300L]
曾崇賢、段曉林、靳知勤（2011）。探究教學的專業成長歷程—以十位國中科學教師
　　的觀點為例。科學教育學刊，19（2），143-168。https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.2011.
　　1902.04
[Tseng, C.-H., Tuan, H.-L., & Chin, C.-C. (2011). The process of teachers’ inquiry teaching
　　professional development: The perceptions of 10 experienced junior-high science teachers.
　　Contemporary Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 143-168. https://doi.org/10.6173/
　　CJSE.2011.1902.04]
劉美慧、陳麗華、林江臺、洪承宇、洪逸文、張茂桂、許民陽、陳育霖、陳學淵、鄭詔
　　月（2024）。十二年國教課綱自然和社會領域「探究與實作」理念的溝通與實踐。
　　教科書研究，17（1），157-184。https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.202404_17(1).05
[Liu, M.-H., Chen, L.-H., Lin, J.-T., Hung, C.-Y., Hung, Y.-W., Chang, M.-K., Hsu, M.-Y., Chen,
　　Y.-L., Chen, H.-Y., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2024). Communicating and implementing the “inquiry
　　and practice” philosophy in the 12-year curriculum guidelines: Natural science and social
　　studies domains. Journal of Textbook Research, 17(1), 157-184. https://doi.org/10.6481/
　　JTR.202404_17(1).05]
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal
　　of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015171124982
Cuenca, A. (2020). Proposing core practices for social studies teacher education: A qualitative
　　content analysis of inquiry-based lessons. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(3), 298-313.
　　https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120948046
Goodwin, J. R. (2024). What’s the difference? A comparison of student-centered teaching
　　methods. Education Sciences, 14(7), 736. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070736
Grant, S. G., Swan, K., & Lee, J. (2017). Inquiry-based practice in social studies education:
　　Understanding the inquiry design model. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.202404_
　　17(1).07
Khalaf, B. K., & Mohammed Zin, Z. B. (2018). Traditional and inquiry-based learning
　　pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 545-
　　564. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11434a
Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Wadsworth. https://doi.
　　org/ 10.1126/science.49.1268.379
Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects
　　of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/
　　00220973.1934.11016107
National Council for the Social Studies. (2013, September 18). The college, career, and civic life
　　(C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12
　　civics, economics, geography, and history. https://www.socialstudies.org/sites/default/
　　files/2017/Jun/c3-framework-for-social-studies-rev0617.pdf
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. The National
　　Academies Press.
Swan, K., Lee, J. K., & Grant, S. G. (2018). Inquiry design model: Building inquiries in social
　　studies. National Council. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003013808-12
Thacker, E., & Friedman, A. (2017). Three social studies teachers’ design and use of inquiry
　　modules. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(3), 360-387.
　　https://doi.org/10.70725/833004pqfpbd
Thacker, E. S., Lee, J. K., Fitchett, P. G., & Journell, W. (2018). Secondary social studies
　　teachers’ experiences planning and implementing inquiry using the inquiry design model.
　　The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 91(4-5), 193-
　　200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2018.1490129

 

全文下載