第六十二輯．第一期 - 2016-03-31

資訊教育系所學位論文研究趨勢與課題：2004～2013學年的文獻計量分析

Topical Trends and Issues of Dissertations and Theses from the Graduate Programs of Information Education in Taiwan

作　者：
方瑀紳、李隆盛 / Yu-Shen Fang, Lung-Sheng Lee
關鍵字：
十二年國教、共詞分析、科技教育、科技領域、統合分析 / 12-year basic education, co-word analysis, technology education, technology learning area, meta-analysis
  • 摘要
  • 英文摘要
  • 參考文獻
  • 全文下載
教育部2014年11月發布之《十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱》，已將中小學「生活科技」和「資訊科技」學科歸在新增的「科技」領域。鑑於大學教育系所的學位論文常是對應中小學教育其學科或領域的基礎或應用研究，本研究採文獻計量分析法，針對「臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統」中資訊教育系所近10年間（2004∼2013學年），合計992篇博碩士學位論文的關鍵字詞做為研究對象，探究國內資訊教育學位論文之研究趨勢與課題，結果發現：一、數量有明顯下滑現象；二、研究主題由原本著重廣泛的數位學習朝向數位學習與教學設計；三、研究主題範圍以資訊教育為主，技術取向的資訊科技為次；四、共詞網絡圖譜呈現領域集群與節點間緊密不足，即研究重點有不夠結構化現象；五、研究主題尚未適切關注教師專業發展和資訊科技素養。
In the “Directions Governing for the 12-Year Basic Education Curricula” promulgated by the Ministry of Education in November 2014, the new learning area “Technology” is comprised of courses “Living Technology (LT)” and “Information Technology (IT).” This study used co-word analysis of bibliometrics to analyze the evolution directions and knowledge orientation of the research topics of the dissertations and theses from the information education graduate programs in Taiwan and completed in the last decade (2004~2013 academic years). Keywords from 992 dissertations and theses in National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan served as the subject of this study. The results show: (1) The number of dissertations and theses significantly declined; (2) Research topical focuses changed from universal e-learning to e-learning and its instructional design; (3) The primary research topics are information education, and secondary technical-oriented information technology; (4) The co-word network maps indicate the lack of closeness between clusters and inter-nodes, which means that it is not well-structured between research focuses; and (5) The research topics completed do not concern themselves properely with teacher’s professional development and information technology literacy.

方瑀紳、李隆盛（2014a）。1994-2013年國內外科技教育學位論文研究取向之比較。科技管理學刊，19（3），33-62。

[Fang, Y.-S., & Lee, L.-S. (2014a). A comparison of research orientations between domestic and international technology education theses and dissertations in 1994-2013. Journal of Technology Management, 19(3), 33-62.]

方瑀紳、李隆盛（2014b）。臺灣科技教育學系變革下學位論文研究趨勢：以共詞分析。教育研究集刊，60（4），99-136。

[Fang, Y.-S., & Lee, L.-S. (2014b). Research trends of thesis and dissertation in the changing departments of technology education in Taiwan: A co-word analysis. Bulletin of Educational Research, 60(4), 99-136.]

方瑀紳、李隆盛（2014c）。數位學習平台「第二生命」（Second Life）研究的知識結構與發展趨勢。科學教育學刊，22（4），331-362。doi:10.6173/CJSE.2014.2204.01

[Fang, Y.-S., & Lee, L.-S. (2014c). The knowledge structure and development trend of the studies of digital learning platform “Second Life”. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 22(4), 331-362. doi: 10.6173/CJSE.2014.2204.01]

王宏德（2013）。學術研究趨勢之分析與探討：以100學年度臺灣學位論文為例。國家圖書館館刊，1，75-98。

[Wang, H.-T. (2013). Analyzing the higher education research trends in Taiwan: A study of 2011 graduation theses and dissertations in the NDLTD-Taiwan. National Central Library Bulletin, 1, 75-98.]

王淑慧、楊宏仁、林子堯（2007）。國內近十年生活科技教師相關學位論文研究取向。科技教育課程改革與發展學術研討會論文集，2006，285-292。

[Wang, S.-H., Yang, H.-J., & Lin, T.-Y. (2007). An approach of master’s thesis and doctoral dissertations of technology teacher from 1996 to 2006 in Taiwan. Conference Proceedings Curriculum & Instruction in Technology Education, 2006, 285-292.]

李清福、陳志銘、曾元顯（2013）。數位學習領域主題分析之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，50（3），319-354。

[Lee, C.-F., Chen, C.-M., & Tseng, Y.-H. (2013). Subject analysis of e-learning research. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 50(3), 319-354.]

李隆盛、吳正己、游光昭、周麗端、葉家棟（2013）。十二年國民基本教育科技領域綱要內容之前導研究（國家教育研究院計畫編號：NAER-102-06-A-1-02-09-1-18）。新北市：國家教育研究院。

[Lee, L.-S., Wu, C.-C., Yu, K.-C., Chou, L.-T., & Yeh, J.-D. (2013). The pilot study for the technology area contents in the twelve-year national basic education curriculum guidelines (National Academy for Educational Research Report: NAER-102-06-A-1-02-09-1-18). New Taipei City, Taiwan: National Academy for Educational Research.]

林頌堅（2010）。以詞語共現網絡分析探勘資訊傳播學領域的研究主題與關係。圖書資訊學研究，4（2），123-148。

[Lin, S.-C. (2010). Exploring the research topics and their relations in the field of information communication via term co-occurrence network analyses. Journal of Library and Information Science Research, 4(2), 123-148.]

國立臺灣大學統計教學中心（2014）。國立臺灣大學初等統計學實習課講義（SAS）。取自http://www.statedu.ntu.edu.tw/lab/SAS_2.0/3.3%20PROC%20CORR.pdf

[National Taiwan University Statistics Education Center. (2014). NTU statistics education center (SAS). Retrieved from http://www.statedu.ntu.edu.tw/lab/SAS_2.0/3.3%20PROC%20CORR.pdf]

教育部（2008a）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要重大議題（資訊教育）。取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php

[Ministry of Education. (2008a). 97 Grade 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines. Retrieved from http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php]

教育部（2008b）。2008教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書2008-2011。取自http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=2338&Page=16848&Index=4&WID=3ee9c9ee-f44e-44f0-a431-c300341d9f77

[Ministry of Education. (2008b). Ministry of Education White Paper on information education 2008-2011 at the elementary and secondary school levels. Retrieved from http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=2338&Page=16848&Index=4&WID=3ee9c9ee-f44e-44f0-a431-c300341d9f77]

教育部國民及學前教育署（2014）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要重大議題（資訊教育）。取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php?login_type=1&header

[K-12 Education Administration, Ministry of Education. (2014). Nine-year syllabus of major issues (Information Education). Retrieved from http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php?login_type=1&header]

教育部統計處（2014）。各級學校基本資料。取自http://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96

[Statistics Department, Ministry of Education. (2014). Basic data of schools at all levels. Retrieved from http://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96]

許雅珠、黃元鶴、黃鴻珠（2011）。機器人文獻之合著網絡及熱門主題分析。教育資料與圖書館學，49（1），39-73。

[Hsu, Y.-C., Huang, Y.-H., & Huang, H.-C. (2011). The co-authorship network and hot topic analysis of robots literatures. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 49(1), 39-73.]

陳良駒、張正宏、陳日鑫（2010）。以特徵詞共現特性探討知識管理研究議題相關性—使用共詞與關聯法則分析。資訊管理學報，17（4），31-60。

[Chen, L.-C., Chang, J.-H., & Chen, J.-H. (2010). Exploring the correlation of knowledge management issues based on co-occurrence analysis of keywords-using the co-word and association rule analysis. Journal of Information Management, 17(4), 31-60.]

靳知勤（2008）。臺灣STS教育領域學位論文之發展回顧與評析。科學教育學刊，16（4），1-23。

[Chin, C.-C. (2008). An overview of graduate theses on STS education in Taiwan between 1992 and 2004. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 1-23.]

盧嘉惠（2010）。數學學習網站對國小五年級學童數學態度之影響：以科學教育學習網數學子網為例（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。

[Lu, C.-H. (2010). The study for fifth graders’ mathematics attitude affected by mathlearning website: Using the mathematics subnet of science education e-learning website (Unpublished master’s thesis). Taipei Municipal University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.]

鍾憲瑞、劉韻僖、方至民（1998）。管理學術界在做什麼：以學術期刊為分析對象。中山管理評論，6（1），169-192。

[Chung, H.-J., Liu, Y.-S., & Fong, C.-M. (1998). What do management scholars study? An analysis of management journals. Sun Yat-Sen Management Review, 6(1), 169-192.]

簡彤紜（2014）。臺灣音樂教育學位論文之研究。學校行政，89，85-103。doi:10.3966/160683002014010089005

[Chien, T.-Y. (2014). A study of dissertations and theses about music education in Taiwan. School Administrators Research Association, 89, 85-103. doi:10.3966/160683002014010089005]

Arora, S. K., Youtie, J., Carley, S., Porter, A. L., & Shapira, P. (2014). Measuring the development of a common scientific lexicon in nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 16(2194), 1-11. doi:10.1007/s11051-013-2194-0

Bach, T. M., Domingues, M. J. C. de S., & Walter, S. A. (2013). Information and communication technologies in education: A bibliometric and sociometric study of 1997-2011. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas), 18(2), 393-416. doi:10.1590/S1414-40772013000200009

Banning, J., & Folkestad, J. E. (2012). STEM education related dissertation abstracts: A bounded qualitative meta-study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 730-741.

BibExcel. (2015). BibExcel. Retrieved from http://www8.umu.se/inforsk/Bibexcel/

Chen, L. C., & Lien, Y. H. (2011). Using author co-citation analysis to examine the intellectual structure of e-learning. Scientometrics, 89(3), 867-886.

Cheng, B., Wang, M. H., Morch, A. I., Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (2014). Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000-2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 11, 56-72. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.01.001

Cho, Y., Park, S., Jo, S. J., & Suh, S. (2013). The landscape of educational technology viewed from the ETR&D journal. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), 677-694. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01338.x

Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402.

Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing and Management, 37(6), 817-842.

Donohue, J. C. (1974). Understanding scientific literature: A bibliometric approach. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Halverson, L. R. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. Internet and Higher Education, 17, 90-100.

Everton, S. F. (2013). Disrupting dark networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Fang, Y.-S., & Lee, L.-S. (2015). Trends in technology education research topics: A co-citation analysis of the literature in 2004-2013. Canadian International Journal of Social Science and Education, 1, 221-234.

He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133-159.

Hung, A., & Perkins, R. (2012). International contributions to e-learning literature from 2000 to 2008. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 56(4), 9-10.

Hung, J. L., & Zhang, K. (2012). Examining mobile learning trends 2003-2008: A categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(1), 1-17.

Law, J., Bauin, S., Courtial, J. P., & Whittaker, J. (1988). Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics, 14(3-4), 251-2641.

Law, J., & Whittaker, J. (1992). Mapping acidification research: A test of the co-word method. Scientometrics, 23(3), 417-461.

Lee, B., & Jeong, Y. I. (2008). Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 77(1), 3-19.

Maurer, H., & Khan, M. S. (2010). Research trends in the field of e-learning from 2003 to 2008: A scientometric and content analysis for selected journals and conferences using visualization. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 7(1), 5-18.

Niu, B. B., Hong, S., Yuan, J. F., Peng, S., Wang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2014). Global trends in sediment-related research in earth science during 1992-2011: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 98(1), 511-529.

Petrina, S. (1998). The politics of research in technology education: A critical content and discourse analysis of the journal of technology education, Volumes 1-8. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 27-57.

Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510-515.

Sherman, T., Sanders, M., & Kwon, H. (2010). Teaching in middle school technology education: A review of recent practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(4), 367-379.

Whittaker, J. (1989). Creativity and conformity in science: Titles, keywords and co-word analysis. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 473-496.

Zuga, K. F. (1994). Implementing technology education: A review and synthesis of the research literature. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED372305.pdf

Zuga, K. F. (1997). An analysis of technology education in the United States based upon an historical overview and review of contemporary curriculum research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(3), 203-217.