第六十八輯．第四期（Open Access） - 2022-12-30

傾聽學生的聲音：中國大陸南方某小學五年級學生的課程詮釋

Listening to Students’ Voices: Curriculum Interpretations of Fifth-grade Students in an Elementary School in South China

作　者：
詹雨欣、宋明娟 / Yuxin Zhan, Min-Chuan Sung
關鍵字：
低社經地位背景學生、洞察、限制、課程詮釋、學生的聲音 / low socioeconomic status students, penetration, limitation, curriculum interpretation, student voice
  • 摘要
  • 英文摘要
  • 參考文獻
  • 全文下載
學生課程詮釋的研究能揭示「瞭解學生」這項探討教育理論與實務的前提，惟相關研究在教育領域中仍顯不足。本研究之目的旨在探究過往未被重視的勞工階級小學生的課程詮釋，以質性研究方法傾聽學生的聲音，探討中國大陸南方一所小學五年級某班學生對課程意義的建構。研究發現，學生們對於科目內容和文憑的詮釋抱持實用導向，重視對考試及出路有用的、日常實用的課程，並以教師權威及教學能力區隔課堂。此外，「循規生」看重文憑的交換價值，「男生小團體」雖有洞察文憑貶值的念頭，卻因內在與外在的限制，其洞察僅為「局部的洞察」。學生所創生的課程詮釋，可見其如何理解自身的生存處境；研究中的勞工階級學生受限於學校傳達考試為社會公平機制之意識型態，而未能看透階級的結構。教育能發揚人性、能協助低社經地位背景學生突破階層壁壘的作用，尚待彰顯。
Research on students’ curriculum interpretations reveals issues regarding understanding students, which serve as a prerequisite for discussing educational theory and practice. This qualitative research investigates the issue ignored in previous studies – the curriculum interpretations of elementary school students from working class families. The students of a fifth-grade class in an elementary school in south China were invited as participants. Firstly, the findings indicate that students’ practical orientation toward curriculum were manifested in viewing curriculum as useful for taking examinations, finding future jobs, and being applicable to daily life. School subjects were also classified according to the teacher’s authority and abilities for teaching. Secondly, the group of boys did not believe that diploma has its function for educational exchange as strongly as the conformists do. Internal and external limitations have been argued to cause their “partial penetration”. Moreover, students’ curriculum interpretations reflect how they perceive their living situation. The students from working class families were not able to deeply penetrate the structure of social class due to the limitation caused by the school ideology which regards the examination as a mechanism for social equality. The final part of the article proposed that education could serve for promoting humanity in that students with low socioeconomic status could overcome the social class barriers.

文東茅（2000）。高等教育規模擴展與畢業生就業。高教探索，4，30-33。

[Weng, D. (2000). Higher education expansion and graduate employment. Higher Education Exploration, 4, 30-33.]

文東茅（2005）。家庭背景對我國高等教育機會及畢業生就業的影響。北京大學教育評論，3，58-63。

[Weng, D. (2005). The impacts of SES on higher education opportunity and graduate employment in China. Peking

　　University Education Review, 3, 58-63.]

田豐（2015）。高等教育體系與菁英階層再生產—基於12所高校調查數據。社會發展研究，1，37-63+243-244。

[Tian, F. (2015). Higher education system and elites reproduction: The survey data of 12 universities and colleges. Journal

　　of Social Development, 1, 37-63+243-244.]

白瑩潔（2008）。學生的課程詮釋—以建中人文社會科學資優班學生為例[未出版碩士論文]。國立臺灣師範大

　　學。

[Pai, Y.-C. (2008). Students’ interpretations of curriculum: Taipei Municipal Chien Kuo High School as an example

　　[Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.]

卯靜儒（2015）。學生課程經驗：問題意識與案例發微。教育學術月刊，8，93-106。

[Mao, C.-J. (2015). An inquiry into students’ experience of curricula: Literature and issues and examples. Education

　　Research Monthly, 8, 93-106.]

李子建、黃顯華（1996）。課程：範式、取向和設計。香港中文大學。

[Lee, C.-K., & Wong, H.-W. (1996). Curriculum: Paradigms, orientations and design. The Chinese University of Hong

　　Kong Press.]

李濤（2014）。底層社會與教育—一個中國西部農業縣的底層教育真相[未出版博士論文]。東北師範大學。

[Li, T. (2014). Underclass of society and education— The truth of underclass’s education in an agricultural country of

　　western China [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Northeast Normal University.]

李濤（2016）。底層的「少年們」：中國西部鄉校階層再生產的隱性預演。社會科學，1，82-92。

[Li, T. (2016). Juveniles from lower class: A microsocial research on class reproduction in rural school in west China.

　　Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 82-92.]

林秀珍（2007）。經驗與教育探微—杜威（J. Dewey）教育哲學之詮釋。師大書苑。

[Lin, S.-J. (2007). An exploration of experience and education— Interpretations of J. Dewey’s philosophy of education.

　　Lucky Bookstore.]

周揚、謝宇（2020）。從大學到菁英大學：高等教育擴張下的異質性收入回報與社會歸 類機制。教育研究，5，

　　86-98。

[Zhou, Y., & Xie, Y. (2020). From universities to elite universities: Heterogeneous returns to higher education and the

　　sorting mechanism in the context of higher education expansion in China. Educational Research, 5, 86-98.]

周新富（2005）。布爾迪厄論學校教育與文化再製。心理。

[Chou, H.-F. (2005). Bourdieu on school education and cultural reproduction. Psychological.]

周瀟（2011）。反學校文化與階級再生產：「小子」與「子弟」之比較。社會，5，70- 92。

[Zhou, X. (2011). Counter-school culture: A comparative study of “Lads” and “Zidi”. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 5, 70-

　　92.]

施良方（1994）。課程定義辨析。教育評論，3，44-47。

[Shi, L. (1994). Analysis on the definition of curriculum. Education Review, 3, 44-47.]

洪豔（2009）。我國「就業難」與「用工荒」現象並存的原因探究—以經濟和社會角 度為研究點。知識經濟，

　　10，61-62。

[Hong, Y. (2009). An investigation into the reasons for the coexistence of “employment difficulties” and “labor shortage”

　　in China: An economic and social perspective. Knowledge Economy, 10, 61-62.]

陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。五南。

[Chen, X. (2002). Qualitative research in social sciences. Wu-Nan Book.]

陳清檳、鄭博文、賴慧敏、蕭錫錡（2015）。大學畢業生取得證照與薪資所得：傾向分數配對法之分析。當代教

　　育研究季刊，23（1），71-111。https://doi.org/10.6151/ CERQ.2015.2301.03

[Chen, C.-P., Cheng, P.-W., Lai, H.-M., & Hsiao, H.-C. (2015). Exploring the relationship between certifications and

　　wages among university graduate students: A propensity scorematched analysis. Contemporary Educational Research

　　Quarterly, 23(1), 71-111. https:// doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.2015.2301.03]

張芬芬（2010）。質性資料分析的五步驟：在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊，35，87-120。

[Chang, F.-F. (2010). The five steps of qualitative data analysis: Climbing up a ladder of abstraction. Journal of Elementary

　　Education, 35, 87-120.]

張明、張學敏、涂先進（2016）。高等教育能打破階層固化嗎？—基於有序probit半參數估計及夏普里分解的實

　　證分析。財經研究，8，15-26。

[Zhang, M., Zhang, X., & Tu, X. (2016). Does higher education break down social solidification? An empirical study

　　based on ordered-probit semi-parameter estimation and shapely value decomposition. Journal of Finance and

　　Economics, 8, 15-26.]

張宜君、林宗弘（2015）。臺灣的高等教育擴張與階級複製：混合效應維續的不平等。臺灣教育社會學研究，15

　　（2），85-129。https://doi.org/10.3966/168020042015121502003

[Chang, Y.-C., & Lin, T.-H. (2015). How does the expansion of higher education reproduce class inequality? The case of

　　Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(2), 85-129. https://doi.org/10.3966/168020042015121502003]

黃光雄、蔡清田（2000）。課程發展與設計：理念與實作。師大書苑。

[Huang, K.-H., & Tsai, C.-T. (2000). Curriculum development and design: Theory and practice. Lucky Bookstore.]

黃政傑（1983）。課程概念剖析。教育研究集刊，6，149-178。

[Hwang, J.-J. (1983). The conceptions of the curriculum. Bulletin of Educational Research, 6, 149-178.]

黃政傑（1991）。課程設計。東華。

[Huang, Z.-J. (1991). Curriculum design. Tung Hua.]

黃鴻文（2003）。國民中學學生文化之民族誌研究。學富。

[Huang, H.-W. (2003). Ethnography of junior high school students’ culture. Pro-Ed.]

黃鴻文、王心怡（2010）。教育分流與性別再製—二班高中女生學生文化之民族誌研究。臺灣教育社會學研究，

　　10（1），127-174。

[Huang, H.-W., & Wang, H.-Y. (2010). Tracking and student cultures: An Ethnographic research of two classes of senior

　　high school girls in north Taiwan. Journal of Sociology of Education, 10(1), 127-174.]

黃鴻文、武曉梅（2007）。我們要識字：一群國小補校高齡婦女學生的課程觀。臺灣教育社會學研究，7（1），

　　69-110。

[Huang, H.-W., & Wu, H.-M. (2007). We want to become literate: Senior women students’ perspectives of supplementary

　　school curriculum. Journal of Sociology of Education, 7(1), 69-110.

黃鴻文、湯仁燕（2005）。學生如何詮釋課程？教育研究集刊，51（2），99-131。https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.

　　200506_(51-2).0004

[Huang, H.-W., & Tang, R.-Y. (2005). How do students interpret school curriculum? Bulletin of Educational Research,

　　51(2), 99-131. https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200506_(51-2).0004]

黃鴻文、鄭英傑、王俐蘋（2016）。為何不傾聽學生的聲音？學生課程觀及對課程研究的啟示。臺灣教育社會學

　　研究，16（1），127-152。https://doi.org/10.3966/168020042016061601004

[Huang, H.-W., Jheng, Y.-J., & Wang, L.-P. (2016). Why not listen to students? Students perspectives on school curriculum

　　and their implications for curriculum research. Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(1), 127-152. https://doi.org/10.

　　3966/168020042016061601004]

甄曉蘭（2004）。課程理論與實務—解構與重建。高等教育。

[Chen, H.-L. (2004). Curriculum theory and practice: From deconstructing to reconstructing. Higher Education.]

蔡碧夆（2008）。升學氛圍下國中學生的課程觀[未出版碩士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。

[Tsai, P.-F. (2007). Junior high school students’ perspectives of curriculum under the atmosphere of diplomaism

　　[Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.]

廖鳳瑞、李昭瑩（2004）。當孩子與老師運作的課程相遇—幼兒經驗課程的個案研究。師大學報：教育類，49

　　（2），89-112。https://doi.org/10.29882/JTNUE. 200410.0005

[Liaw, F.-R., & Lee, C.-Y. (2004). When children encounter teacher’s manifest curriculum: A case study of young

　　children’s experiential curriculum. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Education, 49(2), 89-112. https://

　　doi.org/10.29882/JTNUE.200410.0005]

熊春文、王毅、折曦（2014）。「混日子」：對農民工子弟就學文化的一種理解。南京工業大學學報（社會科學

　　版），13（2），108-117。

[Xiong, C. W., Wang, Y., & Zhe, X. (2014). “Goofing off”: An understanding of schooling among children of migrant

　　workers. Journal of Nanjing Tech University (Social Science Edition), 13(2), 108-117.]

劉國兆（2013）。升學主義、學校生活與課後補習：一群七年級國中生的課程觀。臺灣教育社會學研究，16

　　（1），127-152。https://doi.org/10.3966/199044282013104702004

[Liu K.-C. (2013). Diplomaism, school campus life, and cram schooling: A group of seventh grade student’s curriculum

　　perspectives. Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(1), 127- 152. https://doi.org/10.3966/199044282013104702004]

Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and education. Simon & Schuster.

Doyle,W. (1997). Children’s interpretations of curriculum events. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(5), 499-511.

　　https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00054-6

Erikson, F., & Shultz, J. (1992). Students’ experience of the curriculum. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on

　　curriculum: A project of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 465-485). Macmillan.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H.（2021）。教育研究法：研究設計實務（楊孟麗、謝水南，譯）。心

　　理。（原著出版於2019）

[Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2021). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.) (M.-L.

　　Yang & S.-N. Hsieh, Trans.). Psychological.]

Willis, P.（2013）。學做工：工人階級子弟為何繼承父業（秘舒、凌旻華，譯）。譯林。（原著出版於1977）

[Willis, P. (2013). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs (S. Mi & M. Ling, Trans.). Yi Lin.

　　(Original work published 1977)]

Goodlad, J. I. (1979). Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice. McGraw-Hill.

Haydn, T., & Harris, R. (2010). Pupil perspectives on the purposes and benefits of studying history in high school: A view

　　from the UK. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(2), 241-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270903403189

Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classroom. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Johnson, B., & Cristensen, L. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage.

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study.

　　International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010006518

Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the

　　study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. Peter Lang.

Rogers, V. (1989). Assessing the curriculum experienced by children. Phi Delta Kappan, May, 714-717.

Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs . Columbia University Press.

Wood, N. B., Lawrenz, F., & Haroldson, R. (2009). A judicial presentation of evidence of a student culture of “dealing”.

　　Journal of Research in Science teaching, 46(4), 421-441. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20272

 

全文下載